Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 6;3(1):e12631.
doi: 10.1002/emp2.12631. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Concept review of regionalized systems of acute care: Is regionalization the next frontier in sepsis care?

Affiliations

Concept review of regionalized systems of acute care: Is regionalization the next frontier in sepsis care?

Nathan T Walton et al. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. .

Abstract

Regionalization has become a buzzword in US health care policy. Regionalization, however, has varied meanings, and definitions have lacked contextual information important to understanding its role in improving care. This concept review is a comprehensive primer and summation of 8 common core components of the national models of regionalization informed by text-based analysis of the writing of involved organizations (professional, regulatory, and research) guided by semistructured interviews with organizational leaders. Further, this generalized model of regionalized care is applied to sepsis care, a novel discussion, drawing on existing small-scale applications. This discussion highlights the fit of regionalization principles to the sepsis care model and the actualized and perceived potential benefits. The principal aim of this concept review is to outline regionalization in the United States and provide a roadmap and novel discussion of regionalized care integration for sepsis care.

Keywords: delivery of health care; emergency service; hospital planning; integrated; intensive care units; regional medical programs; sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No financial or non‐financial competing interests for either author.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram illustrating the standard sequencing of patient care for time‐critical conditions
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Pictorial representation of the structural generalization of regionalized systems of acute care. The interior of the figure is composed of the identified 8 core components of regionalized systems that function concurrently. The circles in the outer triangle are the 3 constituents and description of the role and structure they provide relative to one another (the text on the lines between the circles) in systems of care. The figure demonstrates the multipart and party efforts that sustain the national models of regionalized care
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
These 3 characteristic models, which have been discussed in the literature, demonstrate the degree of integration and organization within regionalized networks of care. Arrows indicate patient flow. The “integrated web” model has emerged as the desired conception of a regionalized and integrated system of care

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Martinez R, Carr B. Creating integrated networks of emergency care: from vision to value. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(12):2082‐2890. - PubMed
    1. Health Resources Administration , Ginzberg E. Regionalization & Health Policy. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Health Resources Administration; 1977.
    1. Institute of Medicine . Regionalizing Emergency Care: Workshop Summary. The National Academies Press; 2010:166. - PubMed
    1. Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume‐outcome relationship: practice‐makes‐perfect or selective‐referral patterns? Health Serv Res. 1987;22(2):157. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shahian DM, Normand S‐LT. The volume‐outcome relationship: from Luft to Leapfrog. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(3):1048‐1058. - PubMed