Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;70(1):1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2021.11.019. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

[Artificial intelligence for medical information departments : construction and evaluation of a decision-making tool to identify and prioritize stays of which the PMSI coding could be optimized, and to ensure the revenues generated by activity-based pricing]

[Article in French]
Affiliations

[Artificial intelligence for medical information departments : construction and evaluation of a decision-making tool to identify and prioritize stays of which the PMSI coding could be optimized, and to ensure the revenues generated by activity-based pricing]

[Article in French]
J Gutton et al. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Medical Information Departments help to optimize the hospital revenues generated by activity-based pricing. A review of medical files, selected after the targeting of coding summaries, is organized. The aim is to make any corrections to the diagnoses or coded procedures with a potential impact on the pricing of the stay. Targeting is of major importance as a means of concentrating resources on the files for which coding can be effectively improved. The tools available for targeting can be optimized. We have developed a decision-making support tool to make targeting more efficient. The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of this tool.

Methods: The tool combines an artificial intelligence module with a rule-based expert module. A predictive score is assigned to each coding summary that reflects the probability of a revalued stay. Evaluation of the performance of this tool was based on a sample of 400 stays of at least 3 nights of patients hospitalized at the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital from 1st November to 31st December 2019. Each stay was reviewed by a coding expert, without knowledge of the score assigned and without help from expert queries. Two main assessment criteria were used: area under the ROC curve and positive predictive value (PPV).

Results: The area under the ROC curve was 0.70 (CI 95% [0.64-0.76]). With a revalued coding rate of 32%, PPV was 41% for scores above 5, 65% for scores above 8, 88% for scores above 9.

Conclusion: The study made it possible to validate the performance of the tool. The implementation of new variables could further increase its performance. This is an area of development to be considered, particularly with in view of generalizing individual invoicing in hospitals.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Clinical coding; Codage clinique; Contrôle de qualité; Decision Making/ Computer-Assisted; Diagnosis-related Groups; Dossiers médicaux; Groupes homogènes de malades; Intelligence artificielle; Medical records; Prise de décision assistée par ordinateur; Prospective Payment System; Quality control; Systèmes de paiement préétablis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Déclaration de liens d'intérêts Les auteurs ne déclarent aucun conflit d'intérêt

LinkOut - more resources