Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;10(1):e003461.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003461.

Large-scale manufacturing and characterization of CMV-CD19CAR T cells

Affiliations

Large-scale manufacturing and characterization of CMV-CD19CAR T cells

Xiuli Wang et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Adoptive transfer of CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CD19CAR) T cells can induce dramatic disease regression in patients with B cell malignancies. CD19CAR T cell therapy may be limited by insufficient engraftment and persistence, resulting in tumor relapse. We previously demonstrated a proof of principle that cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells can be isolated and enriched prior to CD19CAR transduction to produce CMV-CD19CAR T cells, and that these CMV-CD19CAR T cells can be expanded in vivo through CMV vaccination, resulting in better tumor control in a murine model. Here we developed a clinical platform for generating CMV-CD19CAR T cells.

Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from CMV-seropositive healthy donors were stimulated with a good manufacturing practices-grade PepTivator overlapping CMVpp65 peptide pool and enriched for CMV-responsive interferon γ (IFNγ)+T cells using IFNγ Catchmatrix, within the CliniMACS Prodigy Cytokine Capture System (Miltenyi Biotec). Resulting CMV-specific T cells were transduced with a lentiviral vector encoding a second generation CD19R:CD28:ζ/EGFRt CAR and expanded with interleukin 2 (IL-2) and IL-15 for 15 days before characterization.

Results: CMV-specific T cells were enriched from 0.8%±0.5 of input PBMC to 76.3%±11.6 in nine full-scale qualification runs (absolute yield of 4.2±3.3×106 IFNγ+T cells from an input of 1×109 PBMCs). Average CD19CAR transduction efficiency of CMV-specific T cells was 27.0%±14.2 in the final products, which underwent rapid expansion, resulting in a total cell dose of 6.2±0.9 × 106 CD19CAR-tranduced T cells with CMV specificity (ie, functionally bispecific). CMV-CD19CAR T cells were polyclonal, expressed memory markers but had low expression of exhaustion markers, responded to both CD19 and CMVpp65 stimulation with rapid proliferation and exhibited antigen-specific effector functions against both CD19-expressing tumors and CMVpp65 antigen. The final products passed release criteria for clinical use.

Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of our large-scale platform for generating CMV-CD19CAR T cells for clinical application. We plan to initiate a clinical trial at City of Hope using CMV-CD19CAR T cells for patients with intermediate/high-grade B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma immediately after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation followed by vaccination with a novel CMV vaccine based on Modified Vaccinia Ankara (Triplex) 28 days and 56 days post-T cell infusion.

Keywords: adoptive; cell engineering; chimeric antigen; hematologic neoplasms; immunotherapy; receptors; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical scale CliniMACS Prodigy immunomagnetic selection of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells. (A) Development of clinically feasible platform for derivation of CMV-CD19CAR T cells. (B) Leukapheresis products were obtained from CMV-immune healthy donors and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated and purified by density gradient centrifugation over Ficoll-Paque. PBMCs (1×109) were loaded on the closed and automated CliniMACS Prodigy cytokine capture system (CCS) system (Miltenyi Biotec) and CMV-specific T cells were isolated. The percentage of live, purified interferon γ (IFNγ) positive cells (black) over pre-enrichment (red) from three representative donors are depicted. (C) Phenotypic characterization of IFNγ-positive gated cells are presented. Data from three representative donors are presented. APC, allophycocyanin; FITC, fluorescein; PE, phycoerythrin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Generation of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. (A) One day after isolation, CMV-specific T cells were transduced with a second-generation CD19CAR/CD28/EGFRt lentiviral vector with IgG4 Fc hinge region mutations (L235E; N297Q) at MOI 3 in the presence of 50 U/mL IL-2, 1 ng/mL IL-15, and 100 µg/mL protamine sulfate. The transduced CMV-CD19CAR T cells formed clusters as seen under light microscopy in 10 × magnification. (B) Total viable cell count was performed every other day for 14 days to assess in vitro expansion. (C) The proportion of CAR +cells in the products after 14 days of in vitro expansion was analyzed with flow cytometry. EGFR +cells after subtraction of isotype control (red) are presented. Representative data from multiple donors are presented.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phenotypic characterization of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD19CAR T cells. (A) The final products were stained with antibodies against indicated immune receptors. Per cent positive cells (means±SD) under chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) +population from three different T cell products are presented. (B) CMV-CD19CAR T cells were labeled with CellTrace Violet dye (CTV) and co-cultured with 8000-cGy-irradiated lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) cells and 3700 cGy-irradiated, autologous CMVpp65-pepmix-pulsed peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at 1:1 ratio for 7 days. Dilution of CTV was analyzed by flow cytometry. Per cent positive cells (means±SD) under CAR +population from three different donor-derived T cell products are depicted. Replicates were conducted for each product. (C) To simultaneously quantify specific mRNA levels and both cell surface and intracellular proteins, CMV-CD19CAR T cells were incubated overnight with either pp65pepmix-loaded autologous PBMC to stimulate the CMV-specific T cell receptor (TCR) (pp65 stim) or LCL cells to stimulate the CD19CAR (CAR stim). Cells were subsequently stained with Erbitux and anti-CD3 antibodies to detect CAR +and CD3+cells. After fixation, cells were permeabilized with PrimeFlow RNA permeabilization buffer in the presence of RNAase inhibitors followed by intracellular interferon γ (IFNγ) staining. Next day, the cells were labeled with RNA probes including genes that are related T cell persistence (telomerase Tert, IL-2), memory (KLF2, TCF7, Lef1), homing (CCR7, ITAG5, ITAG3), and activation/exhaustion (PDCD1). Gene expression on gated EGFR (CAR+) and intracellular IFNγ double positive cells were analyzed with flow cytometry (10,000 cells were acquired for analysis).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Dual functionality of cytomegalovirus (CMV)--specific CD19CAR T cells against CD19 and CMV pp65 antigens. (A) Propagated CMV-CD19CAR T cells were stimulated overnight with CD19 +tumor (lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL)) and CMVpp65pepmix-pulsed PBMC. OKT3 LCL and medium were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The frequency of intracellular interferon γ (IFNγ) in CD3 +T cells from three representative CMV-CD19CAR T cell products are depicted. (B) The composition of T cell subsets in the final CMV-CD19CAR T cell products within the CD3 +population and (C) the relative proportion of IFNγ+cells within the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) + populations from three different donors are presented.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cytolytic potency and effector cytokine secretion by cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD19CAR T cells. (A) CMV-CD19CAR T cells were co-cultured with GFP+ target cells (lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL)) at different effector:target ratios for 3 days and remaining eGFP+ tumor cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. KG1a (CD19-) and OKT3 LCL were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Cytotoxicity was normalized to the tumor only cultures. Data from three different donor-derived CMV-CD19CAR T cells are presented. (B) To test the proliferative capacity against CD19+ (LCL) and CMVpp65 targets, CMV-CD19CAR T cells were labeled with CellTrace Violet dye (CTV) and co-cultured with 8000-cGy-irradiated LCL cells and 3700 cGy-irradiated autologous CMVpp65-pepmix pulsed peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at 1:1 ratio for 7 days. Dilution of CTV was analyzed by flow cytometry. Data from two representative CMV-CD19CAR T cell products are depicted. (C) CMV-CD19CAR T cells (1×105) were cocultured overnight in 96-well tissue culture plates with 1×105 LCL, OKT3 LCL, KG1a, or autologous CMVpp65-pepmix pulsed PBMCs. Supernatants were collected and analyzed with the Luminex IS100 bead array technology for Human Cytokine 30-Plex according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Mean±SD from three different donors are presented. #: out of range above. ***p<0.001. **p<0.01, *p<0.05.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD19CAR T cells possess stronger effector function against CD19 +tumor compared with monospecific CD19CAR T cells. (A) CMV-CD19CAR T cells were also generated from the same donor and were expanded for 14 days. Both CD19CAR T cells and CMV-CD19CAR T cells were then stimulated with CD19+target cells (lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL)) overnight and intracellular interferon γ (IFNγ) was analyzed by flow cytometry. Data from three different donor-derived CD19CAR and CMV-CD19CAR T cells are presented. CMV-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells without stimulation were used as controls. (B) To generate conventional monospecific CD19CAR T cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 and transduced with the same CD19CAR lentivirus and expanded for 14 days. CD19CAR T cells were then stimulated with CD19+target cells (LCL) overnight and intracellular IFNγ was analyzed by flow cytometry. Data from three different donor-derived CD19CAR T cells are presented. CD19CAR T cells without stimulation were used as controls.

References

    1. Walter EA, Greenberg PD, Gilbert MJ, et al. . Reconstitution of cellular immunity against cytomegalovirus in recipients of allogeneic bone marrow by transfer of T-cell clones from the donor. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1038–44. 10.1056/NEJM199510193331603 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leen AM, Christin A, Myers GD, et al. . Cytotoxic T lymphocyte therapy with donor T cells prevents and treats adenovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infections after haploidentical and matched unrelated stem cell transplantation. Blood 2009;114:4283–92. 10.1182/blood-2009-07-232454 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bollard CM, Kuehnle I, Leen A, et al. . Adoptive immunotherapy for posttransplantation viral infections. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2004;10:143–55. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2003.09.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feuchtinger T, Opherk K, Bethge WA, et al. . Adoptive transfer of pp65-specific T cells for the treatment of chemorefractory cytomegalovirus disease or reactivation after haploidentical and matched unrelated stem cell transplantation. Blood 2010;116:4360–7. 10.1182/blood-2010-01-262089 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive-cell-transfer therapy for the treatment of patients with cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:666–75. 10.1038/nrc1167 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources