Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;28(1):136-143.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01599-w. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

Optimizing risk-based breast cancer screening policies with reinforcement learning

Affiliations

Optimizing risk-based breast cancer screening policies with reinforcement learning

Adam Yala et al. Nat Med. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Screening programs must balance the benefit of early detection with the cost of overscreening. Here, we introduce a novel reinforcement learning-based framework for personalized screening, Tempo, and demonstrate its efficacy in the context of breast cancer. We trained our risk-based screening policies on a large screening mammography dataset from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH; USA) and validated this dataset in held-out patients from MGH and external datasets from Emory University (Emory; USA), Karolinska Institute (Karolinska; Sweden) and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH; Taiwan). Across all test sets, we find that the Tempo policy combined with an image-based artificial intelligence (AI) risk model is significantly more efficient than current regimens used in clinical practice in terms of simulated early detection per screen frequency. Moreover, we show that the same Tempo policy can be easily adapted to a wide range of possible screening preferences, allowing clinicians to select their desired trade-off between early detection and screening costs without training new policies. Finally, we demonstrate that Tempo policies based on AI-based risk models outperform Tempo policies based on less accurate clinical risk models. Altogether, our results show that pairing AI-based risk models with agile AI-designed screening policies has the potential to improve screening programs by advancing early detection while reducing overscreening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Smith, R. A. et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2019: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J. Clin. 69, 184–210 (2019). - DOI
    1. Wernli, K. J. et al. Screening for skin cancer in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 316, 436–447 (2016). - DOI
    1. Coleman, C. Early detection and screening for breast cancer. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 33, 141–155 (2017). - DOI
    1. Curry, S. J. et al. Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 320, 674–686 (2018). - DOI
    1. Gier, R. A. et al. High-performance crispr-cas12a genome editing for combinatorial genetic screening. Nat. Commun. 11, 3455 (2020). - DOI

Publication types