Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 2;4(2):374-384.
doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000202. eCollection 2021.

Evaluation of different stool extraction methods for metabolomics measurements in human faecal samples

Affiliations

Evaluation of different stool extraction methods for metabolomics measurements in human faecal samples

Vanessa Erben et al. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. .

Abstract

Background: Metabolomics analysis of human stool samples is of great interest for a broad range of applications in biomedical research including early detection of colorectal neoplasms. However, due to the complexity of metabolites there is no consensus on how to process samples for stool metabolomics measurements to obtain a broad coverage of hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances.

Methods: We used frozen stool samples (50 mg) from healthy study participants. Stool samples were processed after thawing using eight different processing protocols and different solvents (solvents such as phosphate-buffered saline, isopropanol, methanol, ethanol, acetonitrile and solvent mixtures with or without following evaporation and concentration steps). Metabolites were measured afterwards using the MxP Quant 500 kit (Biocrates). The best performing protocol was subsequently applied to compare stool samples of participants with different dietary habits.

Results: In this study, we were able to determine up to 340 metabolites of various chemical classes extracted from stool samples of healthy study participants with eight different protocols. Polar metabolites such as amino acids could be measured with each method while other metabolite classes, particular lipid species (better with isopropanol and ethanol or methanol following a drying step), are more dependent on the solvent or combination of solvents used. Only a small number of triglycerides or acylcarnitines were detected in human faeces. Extraction efficiency was higher for protocols using isopropanol (131 metabolites>limit of detection (LOD)) or those using ethanol or methanol and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) including an evaporation and concentration step (303 and 342 metabolites>LOD, respectively) than for other protocols. We detected significant faecal metabolite differences between vegetarians, semivegetarians and non-vegetarians.

Conclusion: For the evaluation of metabolites in faecal samples, we found protocols using solvents like isopropanol and those using ethanol or methanol, and MTBE including an evaporation and concentration step to be superior regarding the number of detected metabolites of different chemical classes over others tested in this study.

Keywords: dietary patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors disclose no potential conflict of interests. We received the MxP® Quant 500 Kit (Biocrates Life Sciences AG, Innsbruck, Austria) used in this study free of charge and thank Biocrates for their kind support.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of metabolites that can be assessed by each protocol and in total by chemical class for the LC-MS (A) and FIA analysis (B) separately (dashed lines indicate those below the limit of detection).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of mean intra-individual coefficients of variation reflecting variability of measurements in multiple stool aliquots from the same individuals.

References

    1. Phua LC, Chue XP, Koh PK, et al. . Non-Invasive fecal metabonomic detection of colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2014;15:389–97. 10.4161/cbt.27625 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rose C, Parker A, Jefferson B, et al. . The characterization of feces and urine: a review of the literature to inform advanced treatment technology. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2015;45:1827–79. 10.1080/10643389.2014.1000761 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhgun ES, Ilina EN. Fecal metabolites as non-invasive biomarkers of gut diseases. Acta Naturae 2020;12:4–14. 10.32607/actanaturae.11151 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weir TL, Manter DK, Sheflin AM, et al. . Stool microbiome and metabolome differences between colorectal cancer patients and healthy adults. PLoS One 2013;8:e70803. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070803 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Youssef O, Lahti L, Kokkola A, et al. . Stool microbiota composition differs in patients with stomach, colon, and rectal neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci 2018;63:2950–8. 10.1007/s10620-018-5190-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources