Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;36(6):841-854.
doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0866. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Chandler Dora et al. J Endourol. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) uses real-time MR thermometry feedback to target prostate disease. We systematically review the literature to synthesize efficacy, functional, and safety outcomes and assess the influence of planned ablation fraction on outcome. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2021 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting at least one efficacy, functional, or safety outcome after a single TULSA treatment were included. The relationship of freedom from salvage treatment and potency preservation with planned ablation volume was modeled. Results: Two hundred twenty-four patients were treated in 10 studies with up to a 5-year follow-up, mainly for primary localized prostate cancer (PCa) plus smaller cohorts with recurrent PCa, and locally advanced PCa (LAPC). The prostate-specific antigen decline from baseline up to 2 years, including focal to whole-gland ablation plans, was 54% to 97%. The rate of salvage treatment after one TULSA treatment for primary PCa was 7% to 17%. Continence and potency preservation were from 92% to 100% and from 75% to 98%. Urinary symptoms were stable in men with good voiding function at baseline, and 85% of men with concurrent PCa and lower urinary tract symptoms met the criteria for improvement. Symptom relief in a small cohort of men with LAPC was observed. Grade III adverse events were incurred by 13/224 men (6%), with no rectal injury/fistula or Grade IV complication. The planned ablation fraction was linearly related to salvage-free survival. The relationship between potency preservation and planned ablation fraction followed a sigmoid curve. Conclusions: As an alternative to conventional treatments, TULSA is safe and effective for prostate tissue ablation in men with primary PCa. There is also evidence that TULSA delivers effective relief of urinary symptoms while treating PCa in a single, low-morbidity procedure. The likelihood of freedom from additional treatment or potency preservation is associated with the planned ablation fraction.

Keywords: MRI-guided therapy; minimally invasive therapy; prostate cancer; systematic review; transurethral MRI-guided ultrasound ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

G.M.C. is an employee of Profound Medical, Inc., and receives salary and stock options.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
PRISMA flow diagram. Overview of study selection to meet the inclusion criteria. PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Relationship between planned ablation fraction and: (A) salvage-free survival, or freedom from additional or salvage treatment by up to 2 years after a single TULSA procedure, and (B) the rate of potency preservation. Only studies with intent-to-treat were included in (A), only men who were potent at baseline were included in (B), and both (A, B) include only men treated for primary prostate cancer. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals, and the legend indicates the study from which each data point was derived. The number of patients included at each data point is shown. Color images are available online.

Comment in

  • Laparoscopy/New Technology.
    Cadeddu JA. Cadeddu JA. J Urol. 2023 Jan;209(1):279. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003004. Epub 2022 Oct 10. J Urol. 2023. PMID: 36215123 No abstract available.

References

    1. Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. . Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: The prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Instit 2004;96:1358–1367. - PubMed
    1. Burnett AL, Aus G, Canby-Hagino ED, et al. . Erectile function outcome reporting after clinically localized prostate cancer treatment. J Urol 2007;178:597–601. - PubMed
    1. Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J, Pontes JE. Salvage radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin N Am 2001;28:545–553. - PubMed
    1. Valerio M, Cerantola Y, Eggener SE, et al. . New and established technology in focal ablation of the prostate: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2017;71:17–34. - PubMed
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. K191200 Traditional 510(k)—TULSA-PRO System. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf19/K191200.pdf (accessed December 7, 2021).

Publication types

MeSH terms