Full-Thickness Scar Resection After R1/Rx Excised T1 Colorectal Cancers as an Alternative to Completion Surgery
- PMID: 35029166
- DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001621
Full-Thickness Scar Resection After R1/Rx Excised T1 Colorectal Cancers as an Alternative to Completion Surgery
Abstract
Introduction: Local full-thickness resections of the scar (FTRS) after local excision of a T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) with uncertain resection margins is proposed as an alternative strategy to completion surgery (CS), provided that no local intramural residual cancer (LIRC) is found. However, a comparison on long-term oncological outcome between both strategies is missing.
Methods: A large cohort of patients with consecutive T1 CRC between 2000 and 2017 was used. Patients were selected if they underwent a macroscopically complete local excision of a T1 CRC but positive or unassessable (R1/Rx) resection margins at histology and without lymphovascular invasion or poor differentiation. Patients treated with CS or FTRS were compared on the presence of CRC recurrence, a 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and metastasis-free survival.
Results: Of 3,697 patients with a T1 CRC, 434 met the inclusion criteria (mean age 66 years, 61% men). Three hundred thirty-four patients underwent CS, and 100 patients underwent FTRS. The median follow-up period was 64 months. CRC recurrence was seen in 7 patients who underwent CS (2.2%, 95% CI 0.9%-4.6%) and in 8 patients who underwent FTRS (9.0%, 95% CI 3.9%-17.7%). Disease-free survival was lower in FTRS strategy (96.8% vs 89.9%, P = 0.019), but 5 of the 8 FTRS recurrences could be treated with salvage surgery. The metastasis-free survival (CS 96.8% vs FTRS 92.1%, P = 0.10) and overall survival (CS 95.6% vs FTRS 94.4%, P = 0.55) did not differ significantly between both strategies.
Discussion: FTRS after local excision of a T1 CRC with R1/Rx resection margins as a sole risk factor, followed by surveillance and salvage surgery in case of CRC recurrence, could be a valid alternative strategy to CS.
Copyright © 2022 by The American College of Gastroenterology.
Comment in
-
Endoscopic R1/Rx Resection of T1 Colorectal Cancer-What Next?Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr 1;117(4):603-604. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001670. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35103021
References
-
- Tumours. DWGfG. Dutch Colorectal Cancer Guideline 2014. http://www.oncoline.nl/colorectaalcarcinoom .
-
- Hassan C, Wysocki PT, Fuccio L, et al. Endoscopic surveillance after surgical or endoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) guideline. Endoscopy 2019;51:C1.
-
- Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2020;25:1–42.
-
- Zwager LW, Bastiaansen BAJ, Bronzwaer MES, et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) of colorectal lesions: Results from the Dutch colorectal eFTR registry. Endoscopy 2020;52:1014–23.
-
- Leicher LW, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Westreenen HL. Limited endoscopic-assisted wedge resection for excision of colon polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2017;60:299–302.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous