Clinical factors associated with lower health scores in COVID-19-related persistent olfactory dysfunction
- PMID: 35032409
- PMCID: PMC9011709
- DOI: 10.1002/alr.22978
Clinical factors associated with lower health scores in COVID-19-related persistent olfactory dysfunction
Abstract
Background: Patients with persistent COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction (OD) commonly report parosmia. Understanding the impact of COVID-19 OD and parosmia is critical to prioritizing research and interventions. In this study we investigate the impact of parosmia and other clinical and disease characteristics on health state utility values (HUVs) for those with persistent COVID-19 OD.
Methods: Patients with a history of COVID-19 diagnosis and persistent OD were recruited from a tertiary medical center and a social media support forum for chemosensory dysfunction. Clinical characteristics and disease-specific symptoms were obtained along with self-reported history of smell function and presence of parosmia. HUVs were calculated using indirect (EuroQol 5-Dimension [EQ-5D]) and direct (VAS) measures.
Results: Our study included 286 subjects (75.52% women) with persistent COVID-19-related OD. Results (mean ± standard deviation) of HUVs based on EQ-5D and VAS were 0.81 ± 0.14 and 0.73 ± 0.21, respectively. Mean self-reported smell function (on a 0-10 scale) was 9.67 ± 1.25 pre-COVID-19, 0.93 ± 2.34 at diagnosis, and 3.39 ± 2.32 at most current assessment. A total of 89.16% of the subjects reported parosmia and 24.13% sought medical care for anosmia. Seeing an MD for OD (p < 0.001), female gender (EQ-5D only, p = 0.002), a history of chronic pain (p < 0.05) and depression/anxiety (EQ-5D only, p < 0.001) predicted worse health. Parosmia and persistent symptoms, such as shortness of breath, were associated with lower EQ-5D and VAS scores, but did not independently predict poorer health scores on multivariable analysis.
Conclusion: Persistent COVID-19 OD results in health states comparable to other chronic diseases.
Keywords: COVID-19; health utility values; parosmia; persistent olfactory dysfunction; quality of life.
© 2022 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
A.S.D.: consultant for Stryker Endoscopy, speaker's fees for GSK.
Similar articles
-
Impact of COVID-19 versus chronic rhinosinusitis/rhinitis associated olfactory dysfunction on health utility and quality of life.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Sep 24;7(5):1299-307. doi: 10.1002/lio2.921. Online ahead of print. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 36249088 Free PMC article.
-
Olfactory-related Quality of Life Adjustments in Smell Loss during the Coronavirus-19 Pandemic.Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Mar;36(2):253-260. doi: 10.1177/19458924211053118. Epub 2021 Oct 27. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022. PMID: 34704454
-
Clinical characteristics and associated factors of qualitative olfactory dysfunction.Rhinology. 2023 Oct 1;61(5):432-440. doi: 10.4193/Rhin23.004. Rhinology. 2023. PMID: 37243721
-
Olfactory Dysfunction: A Highly Prevalent Symptom of COVID-19 With Public Health Significance.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jul;163(1):12-15. doi: 10.1177/0194599820926464. Epub 2020 May 5. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020. PMID: 32366160 Review.
-
Parosmia: Pathophysiology and Management.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01189-z. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2025. PMID: 39821581 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of platelet-rich plasma for COVID-19-related olfactory loss: a randomized controlled trial.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023 Jun;13(6):989-997. doi: 10.1002/alr.23116. Epub 2022 Dec 21. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023. PMID: 36507615 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of COVID-19 versus chronic rhinosinusitis/rhinitis associated olfactory dysfunction on health utility and quality of life.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Sep 24;7(5):1299-307. doi: 10.1002/lio2.921. Online ahead of print. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 36249088 Free PMC article.
-
Proof-of-concept: SCENTinel 1.1 rapidly discriminates COVID-19 related olfactory disorders.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Nov 8:2022.03.23.22272807. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.23.22272807. medRxiv. 2022. Update in: Chem Senses. 2023 Jan 1;48:bjad002. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjad002. PMID: 35350197 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Post-viral olfactory loss and parosmia.BMJ Med. 2023 Jul 20;2(1):e000382. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000382. eCollection 2023. BMJ Med. 2023. PMID: 37841969 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The assessment of qualitative olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review of tools and their content validity.Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 20;14:1190994. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190994. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37408960 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lechien JR, Chiesa‐Estomba CM, Beckers E, et al. Prevalence and 6‐month recovery of olfactory dysfunction: a multicentre study of 1363 COVID‐19 patients. J Intern Med. 2021;290:451‐461. - PubMed
-
- Landis BN, Frasnelli J, Croy I, Hummel T. Evaluating the clinical usefulness of structured questions in parosmia assessment. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:1707‐1713. - PubMed