Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;30(4):605-612.
doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

Mechanisms of energy dissipation and relationship with tissue composition in human meniscus

Affiliations

Mechanisms of energy dissipation and relationship with tissue composition in human meniscus

A Morejon et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: The human meniscus is essential in maintaining proper knee joint function. The meniscus absorbs shock, distributes loads, and stabilizes the knee joint to prevent the onset of osteoarthritis. The extent of its shock-absorbing role can be estimated by measuring the energy dissipated by the meniscus during cyclic mechanical loading.

Methods: Samples were prepared from the central and horn regions of medial and lateral human menisci from 8 donors (both knees for total of 16 samples). Cyclic compression tests at several compression strains and frequencies yielded the energy dissipated per tissue volume. A GEE regression model was used to investigate the effects of compression, meniscal side and region, and water content on energy dissipation in order to account for repeated measures within samples.

Results: Energy dissipation by the meniscus increased with compressive strain from ∼0.1 kJ/m3 (at 10% strain) to ∼10 kJ/m3 (at 20% strain) and decreased with loading frequency. Samples from the anterior region provided the largest energy dissipation when compared to central and posterior samples (P < 0.05). Water content for the 16 meniscal tissues was 77.9 (C.I. 72.0-83.8%) of the total tissue mass. A negative correlation was found between energy dissipation and water content (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The extent of energy dissipated by the meniscus is inversely related to loading frequency and meniscal water content.

Keywords: Cyclic compression; Hysteresis; Meniscal dampening; Water content.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure A1:
Figure A1:
Energy dissipation vs. compression frequency. Data are segregated by magnitude of compression (10%: a-c, 15%: d-f, 20%: g-i) and regions (anterior: a, d, g; central: b, e, h; posterior: c, f, i). Open circles refer to lateral samples and closed circles to medial ones.
Figure A2:
Figure A2:
Energy dissipation vs. water content: (a) 10% compression magnitude; (b) 15% compression magnitude; (c) 20% compression magnitude. Open symbols refer to lateral samples and closed symbols to medial ones. Triangles, circles and squares represent the anterior regions, the central regions and posterior regions, respectively. The colors of the symbols refer to the frequencies of compression: 0.125 Hz (black), 0.25 Hz (red), and 0.5 Hz (blue).
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Experimental procedures: a) samples were obtained from the posterior, central and anterior regions of human menisci; b) meniscal wedges were cut into 1.5 mm slices with Compresstome®; c) a 5mm corneal trephine was used to core the slices into discs; d) representative meniscus sample used in compression experiments; e) customized compression chamber for unconfined compression; f) compression cycles consisted of a series of trapezoidal loading curve with a 600s rest time between each cycle.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Representative force response during a cycle of 20% compression strain at a frequency of 0.125 Hz. The equilibrium force recovers to pre-compression levels within the allotted 600s rest time.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
GEE regression model coefficients of energy dissipation comparisons across compression levels, compression frequencies, meniscal side, and meniscal regions. All comparisons were conducted with respect to the case of 10% compression strain, 0.125 Hz compression frequency, lateral side, and anterior region. Bars in the diagram represent the 95% confidence interval of the coefficient.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
GEE regression model coefficients of energy dissipation association with water content for all meniscal sides and regions. Bars in the diagram represent the 95% confidence interval of the coefficient.

References

    1. Freutel M, Scholz NB, Seitz AM, Ignatius A, Dürselen L. Mechanical properties and morphological analysis of the transitional zone between meniscal body and ligamentous meniscal attachments. Journal of Biomechanics 2015; 48: 1350–1355. - PubMed
    1. Sweigart MA, Athanasiou KA. Tensile and Compressive Properties of the Medial Rabbit Meniscus. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 2005; 219: 337–347. - PubMed
    1. Walker PS, Arno S, Bell C, Salvadore G, Borukhov I, Oh C. Function of the medial meniscus in force transmission and stability. Journal of Biomechanics 2015; 48: 1383–1388. - PubMed
    1. Seitz AM, Galbusera F, Krais C, Ignatius A, Dürselen L. Stress-relaxation response of human menisci under confined compression conditions. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2013; 26: 68–80. - PubMed
    1. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The Long-term Consequence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscus Injuries. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2007; 35: 1756–1769. - PubMed

Publication types