Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Mar:163:16-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

Impaired seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with solid tumours receiving anticancer treatment

Affiliations
Observational Study

Impaired seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with solid tumours receiving anticancer treatment

Alessio Amatu et al. Eur J Cancer. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Patients with solid tumours have high COVID-19 mortality. Limited and heterogeneous data are available regarding the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in this population.

Methods and findings: This is a prospective, single-centre cohort study aiming at evaluating seroconversion in terms of anti-spike antibodies in a population of patients with solid tumours undergoing cancer therapy within 2 months before the second vaccine dose, as compared with a cohort of controls. Subjects who were not SARS-CoV-2 naïve were excluded, and 171 patients were included in the final study population (150 vaccinated with BNT162b2, 87.7%; 21 with mRNA-1273, 12.3%) and compared with 2406 controls. The median follow-up time from the second dose of vaccination was 30 days (12-42; IQR: 26-34). Most patients had metastatic disease (138, 80.7%). Seroconversion rate was significantly lower in cancer patients than in controls (94.2% versus 99.8%, p < 0.001). At univariate logistic regression analysis, Odds ratio (OR) for seroconversion was also reduced in older individuals (>70 years). A multivariate logistic model confirmed cancer as the only significant variable in impairing seroconversion (OR 0.03, p < 0.001). In the cancer population, a multivariate analysis among clinical variables, including the type of cancer treatment, showed ECOG PS > 2 as the only one of impact (OR 0.07, p = 0.012).

Conclusions: There is a fraction of 6% of patients with solid tumours undergoing cancer treatment, mainly with poorer performance status, who fail to obtain seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. These patients should be considered for enhanced vaccination strategies and carefully monitored for SARS-CoV-2 infection during cancer treatment.

Keywords: COVID-19; Cancer; Chemotherapy; Immunogenicity; Immunotherapy; Seroconversion; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort diagram. Flow diagram showing the selection process of cancer patients (A) and healthcare workers as control cohort (B). Keys: Anti-N IgG = anti-nucleocapsid immunoglobulin; SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of anti-S antibody titer according to age in cancer and control cohorts. The scatter plot displays anti-S Ab titer (y-axis, log scale) versus age (x-axis) in patients with titer under the essay upper limit of detection (2080 BAU/ml), with marginal density distribution on right and top, respectively; the red line shows the seroconversion limit (33.8 BAU/mL) of the essay. Keys: Ab = antibody; anti-S = anti-spike; BAU = binding arbitrary units; SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Multivariate analysis of clinical variables in the whole study population. The forest plot shows odds ratios for seroconversion, according to age, BMI, gender and group (cancer versus control cohort). Keys: BMI = body mass index.

Comment in

References

    1. Tian Y., Qiu X., Wang C., et al. Cancer associates with risk and severe events of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2021;148(2):363–374. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33213. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saini K.S., Tagliamento M., Lambertini M., et al. Mortality in patients with cancer and coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and pooled analysis of 52 studies. Eur J Cancer. 2020;139:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.08.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinato D.J., Scotti L., Gennari A., et al. Determinants of enhanced vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 in UK patients with cancer: a European study. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2021;150:190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.035. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yekedüz E., Utkan G., Ürün Y. A systematic review and meta-analysis: the effect of active cancer treatment on severity of COVID-19. Eur J Cancer. 2020;141:92–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.028. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thakkar A., Pradhan K., Jindal S., et al. Patterns of seroconversion for SARS-CoV-2 IgG in patients with malignant disease and association with anticancer therapy. Nat Cancer. 2021;2(4):392–399. doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00191-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms