Smartglass augmented reality-assisted targeted prostate biopsy using cognitive point-of-care fusion technology
- PMID: 35034415
- DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2366
Smartglass augmented reality-assisted targeted prostate biopsy using cognitive point-of-care fusion technology
Abstract
Introduction: MRI-guided targeted biopsy has become standard of care for diagnosis of prostate cancer, with establishment of several biopsy techniques and platforms. Augmented reality smart glasses have emerged as novel technology to support image-guided interventions. We aimed to investigate its usage while prostate biopsy.
Methods: MRI with PIRADS-lesions ≥3 was uploaded to smart glasses (Vuzix BladeR ) and augmented reality smart glasses-assisted targeted biopsy (SMART-TB) of the prostate was performed using cognitive fusion technology at the point of care. Detection rates were compared to systematic biopsy. Feasibility for SMART-TB was assessed (10 domains from bad [1] to excellent [10]).
Results: SMART-TB was performed for four patients. Prostate cancer detection was more likely for SMART-TB (46%; 13/28) than for systematic biopsy (27%; 13/48). Feasibility scores were high [8-10] for practicality, multitasking, execution speed, comfort and device weight and low [1-4] for handling, battery and image quality. Median execution time: 28 min; Investment cost smart glass: 1017 USD.
Conclusion: First description of SMART-TB demonstrated convenient feasibility. This novel technology might enhance diagnosis of prostate cancer in future.
Keywords: Vuzix Blade; augmented reality; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; smart glasses.
© 2022 The Authors. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- El-Shater Bosaily A, Parker C, Brown LC, et al. PROMIS-Prostate MR imaging study: a paired validating cohort study evaluating the role of multi-parametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;42:26-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.02.008
-
- DrostFrank-Jan H, Osses DF, Nieboer D, et al. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:4. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2. CD012663.
-
- Wegelin O, van Melick HHE, Hooft L, et al. Comparing three different techniques for magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies: a systematic review of in-bore versus magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion versus cognitive registration. Is there a preferred technique? Eur Urol. 2017;71(4):517-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041
-
- Sountoulides P, Pyrgidis N, Polyzos SA, et al. Micro-ultrasound-guided vs multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2021;205(5):1254-1262. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001639
-
- Sparwasser PM, Schoeb D, Miernik A, Borgmann H. Augmented reality and virtual reality in the operating theatre status quo und quo vadis. Aktuelle Urol 2018;49(6):500-508. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0759-0029
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
