Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 16;22(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02045-0.

What characterizes effective tooth brushing of daily users of powered versus manual toothbrushes?

Affiliations

What characterizes effective tooth brushing of daily users of powered versus manual toothbrushes?

Waldemar Petker-Jung et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Recent data show comparable deficits in oral cleanliness after tooth brushing in habitual users of powered toothbrushes (PT) and manual toothbrushes (MT). The present analysis explores the origin of these deficits by relating aspects of the observed tooth brushing behaviour to plaque after tooth brushing.

Methods: Users of rotating-oscillating PT (N = 48) and of MT (N = 52) brushed their teeth the best they could while being filmed. Video analyses assessed brushing time, number of sextants brushed sufficiently long (7.5 s per surface; NSBSL), brushing of outer surfaces with closed jaws, and brushing movements. Correlation analyses examined the relationship between these parameters and plaque after brushing (Marginal Plaque Index (MPI); Turesky modification of Quigley Hein Index (TQHI)) and gingivitis (Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI)).

Results: In PT users, correlations between behaviour and MPI-scores were significant for the NSBSL (outer surfaces: rho = - 0.249; inner surfaces: rho = - 0.510) and brushing duration (outer surfaces: rho = - 0.399; inner surfaces: rho = - 0.509). In MT users, vertical movements on the outer surfaces were positively related to MPI (rho = 0.299). In contrast, circular movements correlated negatively with MPI in those who brushed all outer sextants sufficiently long (n = 47: rho = - 0.294). In both groups, PBI-scores on the inner surfaces were negatively correlated to NSBSL and brushing duration (rho = - 0.327 - rho = - 0.246).

Conclusion: NSBSL and brushing duration appear to play an important role for brushing effectiveness and gingival health in PT and MT users. Whether PT users apply brushing movements or not apparently does not affect the result. In MT users, circular movements seem to be more efficient than vertical movements on the outer surfaces.

Keywords: Behaviour observation techniques; Dental devices; Dental plaque; Home care; Oral health; Oral hygiene; Powered tooth brush; Tooth brushing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declared that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of brushing time of sextants on the outer and inner surfaces for PT (A) and MT (B) users, respectively. The line in the middle of the box represents the median, the upper and lower borders the 25% (Q1) and 75% (Q3) quartiles respectively. The whiskers represent the highest/lowest value that is still within the limits for outlier values (1.5 times the interquartile distance) and the dots show extreme values. The red line marks a time of 7.5 s per surface sextant, which is considered sufficiently long
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage of time relative to total brushing duration on the outer and inner surfaces, respectively, spent with additional manual brushing movements in PT users (A) and specific brushing movements (circular, horizontal and vertical) in MT users (B). The line in the middle of the box represents the median, the upper and lower borders the 25% (Q1) and 75% (Q3) quartiles respectively. The whiskers represent the highest/lowest value that is still within the limits for outlier values (1.5 times the interquartile distance) and the dots show extreme values

References

    1. Deinzer R, Ebel S, Blättermann H, Weik U, Margraf-Stiksrud J. Toothbrushing: to the best of one's abilities is possibly not good enough. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18:167. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0633-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harnacke D, Beldoch M, Bohn G-H, Seghaoui O, Hegel N, Deinzer R. Oral and written instruction of oral hygiene: a randomized trial. J Periodontol. 2012;83:1206–1212. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110550. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harnacke D, Mitter S, Lehner M, Munzert J, Deinzer R. Improving oral hygiene skills by computer-based training: a randomized controlled comparison of the modified Bass and the Fones techniques. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037072. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harnacke D, Winterfeld T, Erhardt J, Schlueter N, Ganss C, Margraf-Stiksrud J, Deinzer R. What is the best predictor for oral cleanliness after brushing? Results from an observational cohort study. J Periodontol. 2015;86:101–107. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.140152. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deinzer R, Shankar-Subramanian S, Ritsert A, Ebel S, Wöstmann B, Margraf-Stiksrud J, Eidenhardt Z. Good role models? Tooth brushing capabilities of parents: a video observation study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:469. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01823-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources