Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;15(2):345-349.
doi: 10.3233/NPM-210848.

Effective questionnaire design: How to use cognitive interviews to refine questionnaire items

Joanna S Balza  1 , Rachel Cusatis  1 , Siobhan M McDonnell  1 , Mir A Basir  1 , Kathryn E Flynn  1
Affiliations

Effective questionnaire design: How to use cognitive interviews to refine questionnaire items

Joanna S Balza et al. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2022.

Abstract

Background: Cognitive interviewing is a technique that can be used to improve and refine questionnaire items. We describe the basic methodology of cognitive interviewing and illustrate its utility through our experience using cognitive interviews to refine a questionnaire assessing parental understanding of concepts related to preterm birth.

Methods: Cognitive interviews were conducted using current best practices. Results were analyzed by the multidisciplinary research team and questionnaire items that were revealed to be problematic were revised.

Results: Revisions to the questionnaire items were made to improve clarity and to elicit responses that truly reflected the participants understanding of the concept.

Conclusion: Cognitive interviewing is a useful methodology for improving validity of questionnaire items, we recommend researchers developing new questionnaire items design and complete cognitive interviews to improve their items and increase confidence in study conclusions.

Keywords: Cognitive interviews; prematurity; preterm birth; questionnaires; survey validity; surveys.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
    1. Kamp K, Wyatt G, Dudley-Brown S, Brittain K, Given B. Using cognitive interviewing to improve questionnaires: An exemplar study focusing on individual and condition-specific factors. Appl Nurs Res. 2018;43:121–125. - PubMed
    1. Silva JR, Fera B, Sudula S, Koetzle D, Schwalbe C. Cognitive interviewing to improve questionnaires for justice-involved youth. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019;63(10):1931–1951. - PubMed
    1. Bakker‐van Gijssel EJ, Lucassen PL, olde Hartman TC, Assendelft WJ, van Schrojenstein Lantman‐de Valk HM. Constructing a health assessment questionnaire for people with intellectual disabilities: A cognitive interview study. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020;33(3):345–353. - PubMed
    1. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2014.

LinkOut - more resources