Illustrative and historic cases of phenoconversion

Abstract

Intersubject variability in drug response, whether related to efficacy or toxicity, is well recognized clinically. Over the years, drug selection from our pharmacologic armamentarium has moved from providers' preferred choices to more personalized treatments as clinicians' decisions are guided by data from clinical trials. Since the advent of more accessible and affordable pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing, the promise of precise pharmacotherapy has been made. Results have accumulated in the literature with numerous examples demonstrating the value of PGx to improve drug response or prevent drug toxicity. Unfortunately, limited availability of reimbursement policies has dampened the enthusiasm of providers and organizations. The clinical application of PGx knowledge remains difficult for most clinicians under real-world conditions in patients with numerous chronic conditions and polypharmacy. This may be due to phenoconversion, a condition where there is a discrepancy between the genotype-predicted phenotype and the observed phenotype. This condition complicates the interpretation of PGx results and may lead to inappropriate recommendations and clinical decision making. For this reason, regulatory agencies have limited the transfer of information from PGx laboratories directly to consumers, especially recommendations about the use of certain drugs. This mini-review presents cases (mexiletine, propafenone, clopidogrel, warfarin, codeine, procainamide) from historical observations where drug response was modified by phenoconversion. The cases illustrate, from decades ago, that we are still in great need of advanced clinical decision systems that cope with conditions associated with phenoconversion, especially in patients with polypharmacy.

Keywords: Phenoconversion; genotype; pharmacogenomics; phenotype.