Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2013600.
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2013600.

Governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review

Kenneth Yakubu  1 , Andrea Durbach  2 , Alexandra van Waes  3 , Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda  1   4 , David Peiris  1 , Janani Shanthosh  1   2 , Rohina Joshi  4   5
Affiliations

Governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review

Kenneth Yakubu et al. Glob Health Action. .

Abstract

Background: Governments worldwide participate in skilled health worker (SHW) migration agreements to protect access to health services in their countries. Previous studies have described the value offered by these agreements in separate source and destination country perspectives.

Objective: We sought to identify and summarise existing literature on shared value creation for both source and destination countries.

Method: We conducted a systematic scoping review of health databases and grey literature. Using Mark Moore and Colin Talbot frameworks, we summarised the public value propositions in migration agreements and how state actors addressed competing priorities.

Results: Most articles (34/63, 53.9%) reported transnational SHW mobility as the public value proposition for source and destination countries. Fewer articles, 14 (22.2%) and 9 (14.3%) articles, respectively, referred to achieving health workforce sustainability and building capacity for SHW migration governance as shared public values. The most identified competing public value (CPV) was an overriding focus on addressing SHW shortages in destination countries (20/63, 37.7%). Efforts to address this CPV include mitigation of the adverse effects of migration (43/63, 68.3%) and promoting health workforce development in source countries (15, 23.8%). At the same time, state actors retained regulatory discretion for protecting their country's public health interest (34, 54%). Most articles reported the lack of funds (15/63, 23.8%) and implementation mechanisms (19/63, 30.2%) as constraints on the authorising environment and the operational capacity of SHW migration governance systems.

Conclusion: Regarding SHW migration governance, the literature reports shared public value propositions for source and destination countries. It also shows how the value-creating process in the management of SHW migration favours destination countries. Future studies will need to explore shared value creation models that ensure equity in the governance of SHW migration.

Keywords: Health workforce; Immigration; emigration; governance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KY led this review as part of the requirements for an award of a doctorate at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication. These do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of National Health and Medical Research Council (NHRMC), Australian National Heart Foundation (NHF), University of New South Wales (UNSW) or the Scientia Scholarship board.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Summary of search, selection and inclusion process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
List of countries reflected in the reviews.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Public values and competing public values in SHW migration governance.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Handling competing public values in the global governance of SHW migration.
Figures 5.
Figures 5.
Enablers and constraints in creating public value and handling competing public values in the global governance of SHW migration.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Liang S, Macinko J, Yue D, et al. The impact of the health care workforce on under-five mortality in rural China. Hum Resour Health. 2019;17:21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen MP, Mirzoev T, Le TM.. Contribution of health workforce to health outcomes: empirical evidence from Vietnam. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14:68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aluttis C, Bishaw T, Frank MW. The workforce for health in a globalized context–global shortages and international migration. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:23611. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Socha-Dietrich K, Dumont J-C. International migration and movement of doctors to and within OECD countries - 2000 to 2018 [cited 2021. Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/7ca8643e-en
    1. Trines S. Mobile nurses: trends in international labor migration in the nursing field; 2018. [cited 2021 Sep 21]. Available from: https://wenr.wes.org/2018/03/mobile-nurses-trends-in-international-labor...

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources