Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 1;56(3):1510-1521.
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities

Affiliations
Review

Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities

Linn Persson et al. Environ Sci Technol. .

Abstract

We submit that the safe operating space of the planetary boundary of novel entities is exceeded since annual production and releases are increasing at a pace that outstrips the global capacity for assessment and monitoring. The novel entities boundary in the planetary boundaries framework refers to entities that are novel in a geological sense and that could have large-scale impacts that threaten the integrity of Earth system processes. We review the scientific literature relevant to quantifying the boundary for novel entities and highlight plastic pollution as a particular aspect of high concern. An impact pathway from production of novel entities to impacts on Earth system processes is presented. We define and apply three criteria for assessment of the suitability of control variables for the boundary: feasibility, relevance, and comprehensiveness. We propose several complementary control variables to capture the complexity of this boundary, while acknowledging major data limitations. We conclude that humanity is currently operating outside the planetary boundary based on the weight-of-evidence for several of these control variables. The increasing rate of production and releases of larger volumes and higher numbers of novel entities with diverse risk potentials exceed societies' ability to conduct safety related assessments and monitoring. We recommend taking urgent action to reduce the harm associated with exceeding the boundary by reducing the production and releases of novel entities, noting that even so, the persistence of many novel entities and/or their associated effects will continue to pose a threat.

Keywords: Earth system impacts; cap on emissions; chemical pollution; chemicals management capacity; plastic pollution; unknown planetary boundary threats.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A generalized impact pathway for novel entities connecting production capacity, environmental release, fate, and distribution to perturbation of Earth system processes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Current rising global trends of chemical industry production, expressed as the relative growth in some novel entities between 2000 and 2017 (for when comparable data are available): 1. Global production capacity for the chemical industry as a whole, plastics production and pesticide active ingredients (for which earliest data are from 2008); 2. Per capita production capacity in weight for key monomers and solvents: benzene, butadiene, ethylene, propylene, toluene, and xylene, 3: Global consumption of antibiotics. Data from the Global Chemicals Outlook II, Geyer et al. 2017, and Søgaard Jørgensen et al.

Comment in

Similar articles

  • The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
    Landrigan PJ, Raps H, Cropper M, Bald C, Brunner M, Canonizado EM, Charles D, Chiles TC, Donohue MJ, Enck J, Fenichel P, Fleming LE, Ferrier-Pages C, Fordham R, Gozt A, Griffin C, Hahn ME, Haryanto B, Hixson R, Ianelli H, James BD, Kumar P, Laborde A, Law KL, Martin K, Mu J, Mulders Y, Mustapha A, Niu J, Pahl S, Park Y, Pedrotti ML, Pitt JA, Ruchirawat M, Seewoo BJ, Spring M, Stegeman JJ, Suk W, Symeonides C, Takada H, Thompson RC, Vicini A, Wang Z, Whitman E, Wirth D, Wolff M, Yousuf AK, Dunlop S. Landrigan PJ, et al. Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Weathering Plastics as a Planetary Boundary Threat: Exposure, Fate, and Hazards.
    Arp HPH, Kühnel D, Rummel C, MacLeod M, Potthoff A, Reichelt S, Rojo-Nieto E, Schmitt-Jansen M, Sonnenberg J, Toorman E, Jahnke A. Arp HPH, et al. Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jun 1;55(11):7246-7255. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01512. Epub 2021 May 11. Environ Sci Technol. 2021. PMID: 33973471
  • Confronting unknown planetary boundary threats from chemical pollution.
    Persson LM, Breitholtz M, Cousins IT, de Wit CA, MacLeod M, McLachlan MS. Persson LM, et al. Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Nov 19;47(22):12619-22. doi: 10.1021/es402501c. Epub 2013 Sep 16. Environ Sci Technol. 2013. PMID: 23980998
  • Identifying chemicals that are planetary boundary threats.
    MacLeod M, Breitholtz M, Cousins IT, de Wit CA, Persson LM, Rudén C, McLachlan MS. MacLeod M, et al. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Oct 7;48(19):11057-63. doi: 10.1021/es501893m. Epub 2014 Sep 18. Environ Sci Technol. 2014. PMID: 25181298
  • Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution.
    Diamond ML, de Wit CA, Molander S, Scheringer M, Backhaus T, Lohmann R, Arvidsson R, Bergman Å, Hauschild M, Holoubek I, Persson L, Suzuki N, Vighi M, Zetzsch C. Diamond ML, et al. Environ Int. 2015 May;78:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10. Environ Int. 2015. PMID: 25679962 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. UN Environment . Global Chemicals Outlook II - From Legacies to Innovative Solutions: Implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; 978-92-807-3745-5, 2019; p 700.
    1. Rockström J.; Steffen W.; Noone K.; Persson Å.; Chapin F. S. I.; Lambin E.; Lenton T. M.; Scheffer M.; Folke C.; Schellnhuber H. J.; Nykvist B.; de Wit C. A.; Hughes T.; van der Leeuw S.; Rodhe H.; Sorlin S.; Snyder P. K.; Costanza R.; Svedin U.; Falkenmark M.; Karlberg L.; Corell R. W.; Fabry V. J.; Hansen J.; Walker B.; Liverman D.; Richardson K.; Crutzen P.; Foley J. Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14 (2), 3210.5751/ES-03180-140232. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steffen W.; Richardson K.; Rockstrom J.; Cornell S. E.; Fetzer I.; Bennett E. M.; Biggs R.; Carpenter S. R.; de Vries W.; de Wit C. A.; Folke C.; Gerten D.; Heinke J.; Mace G. M.; Persson L. M.; Ramanathan V.; Reyers B.; Sorlin S. Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science 2015, 347 (6223), 1259855–1259855. 10.1126/science.1259855. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diamond M. L.; de Wit C. A.; Molander S.; Scheringer M.; Backhaus T.; Lohmann R.; Arvidsson R.; Bergman A.; Hauschild M.; Holoubek I.; Persson L.; Suzuki N.; Vighi M.; Zetzsch C. Exploring the Planetary Boundary for Chemical Pollution. Environ. Int. 2015, 78, 8–15. 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Persson L. M.; Breitholtz M.; Cousins I. T.; de Wit C. A.; MacLeod M.; McLachlan M. S. Confronting Unknown Planetary Boundary Threats from Chemical Pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (22), 12619–12622. 10.1021/es402501c. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types