Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb:52:151954.
doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.151954. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Ultrasound and elastography in the assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis: A systematic literature review focusing on validation and standardization - WSF Skin Ultrasound Group

Affiliations
Free article

Ultrasound and elastography in the assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis: A systematic literature review focusing on validation and standardization - WSF Skin Ultrasound Group

Tânia Santiago et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the published evidence in the literature on the role of ultrasound and elastography to assess skin involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed within the "Skin Ultrasound Working Group" of the World Scleroderma Foundation, according to the Cochrane Handbook. A search was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases from 1/1/1979 to 31/5/2021, using the participants, intervention, comparator and outcomes (PICO) framework. Only full-text articles involving adults, reported in any language, assessing ultrasound to quantify skin pathology in SSc patients. Two reviewers performed the assessment of risk of bias, data extraction and synthesis, independently.

Results: Forty-six studies out of 3248 references evaluating skin ultrasound and elastography domains were included. B-mode ultrasound was used in 30 studies (65.2%), elastography in nine (19.6%), and both methods in seven (15.2%). The ultrasound outcome measure domains reported were thickness (57.8%) and echogenicity (17.2%); the elastography domain was stiffness (25%). Methods used for image acquisition and analysis were remarkably heterogeneous and frequently under-reported, precluding data synthesis across studies. The same applies to contextual factors and feasibility. Our data syntheses indicated evidence of good reliability and convergent validity for ultrasound thickness evaluation against mRSS and skin histological findings. Stiffness and echogenicity have limited evidence for validity against histological findings. Evidence for sensitivity to change, test-retest reliability, clinical trial discrimination or thresholds of meaning is limited or absent for reported ultrasound domains.

Conclusion: Ultrasound is a valid and reliable tool for skin thickness measurement in SSc but there are significant knowledge gaps regarding skin echogenicity assessment by ultrasound and skin stiffness evaluation by elastography in terms of feasibility, validity and discrimination. Standardization of image acquisition and analysis is needed to foster progress.

Keywords: Skin elastography; Skin ultrasound; Systemic sclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest TS: No conflict of interest ES: No conflict of interest BR: No conflict of interest GL: No conflict of interest LG: No conflict of interest MW: No conflict of interest SW: No conflict of interest AL: No conflict of interest RH: No conflict of interest FDG: reports grants and/or personal fees from AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Capella, Chemomab, Jannsen, Kymab, Mitsubishi-Tanabe. JDP: reports grants and/or personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Permeatus and Sojournix Pharma outside of the submitted work. AI: No conflicts of interest JAP da Silva: No conflicts of interest

Dataset use reported in

Publication types