Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan-Feb;140(1):134-143.
doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0171.R1.08062021.

Patients' preferences regarding physicians' gender: a clinical center cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Patients' preferences regarding physicians' gender: a clinical center cross-sectional study

Carolina Matté Dagostini et al. Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background: Even with the significant growth of female representation within medicine, inequality and prejudice against this group persist.

Objective: To analyze patients' preferences regarding the gender of physicians in general and according to different specialties, and the possible reasons behind their choice.

Design and setting: Cross-sectional study at the Clinical Center of the University of Caxias do Sul, Brazil.

Methods: Over a three-month period in 2020, 1,016 patients were asked to complete a paper-based 11-item questionnaire.

Results: The majority (81.7%; n = 830) of the patients did not have a preference regarding the gender of physicians in general. The preference rate for same-gender physicians was 14.0% (n = 142/1,016), and this preference was more common among female than among male patients (17.6% versus 7.0%; odds ratio, OR = 2.85; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.80-4.52; P < 0.001). When asked about their preference for the gender of the specialist who they were waiting to see, the overall preference rate for a same-gender professional was 17.2% (n = 175). Preference for same-gender specialists was higher for specialties essentially based on pelvic or breast examination (i.e. gynecology, urology, proctology and mastology), compared with others (33.4% versus 9.7%; OR = 4.69; 95% CI = 3.33-6.61; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The patients' model for choice of their physician does not seem to involve physicians' gender in general or in the majority of medical specialties. The data presented in this study may make it easier to understand patients' preferences and concerns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest:None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Reasons for preference for male and female physicians in general according to patients’ gender.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Reasons for preference of same-gender specialists for specialties that are essentially based on pelvic and breast examination, and for other specialties.

References

    1. European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) Gender disparity. Available from: https://eige.europa.eu/taxonomy/term/1162.
    1. Wolfert C, Rohde V, Mielke D, Hernández-Durán S. Female Neurosurgeons in Europe-On a Prevailing Glass Ceiling. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:460–466. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.137. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borow M, Levi B, Carmi R. The Task Force for the Promotion of the Status of Women in Medicine in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J. 2018;20(4):254–259. - PubMed
    1. Koch JA, Casper BR. Women in Medicine: A Conversation in Progress. Am J Med Sci. 2018;355(3):203–204. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.01.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hu YY, Ellis RJ, Hewitt DB, et al. Discrimination, Abuse, Harassment, and Burnout in Surgical Residency Training. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1741–1752. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1903759. - DOI - PMC - PubMed