Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 19;194(2):105.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-09754-7.

Effects of pharmaceuticals on the nitrogen cycle in water and soil: a review

Affiliations
Review

Effects of pharmaceuticals on the nitrogen cycle in water and soil: a review

Reza Pashaei et al. Environ Monit Assess. .

Abstract

The effects of pharmaceuticals on the nitrogen cycle in water and soil have recently become an increasingly important issue for environmental research. However, a few studies have investigated the direct effects of pharmaceuticals on the nitrogen cycle in water and soil. Pharmaceuticals can contribute to inhibition and stimulation of nitrogen cycle processes in the environment. Some pharmaceuticals have no observable effect on the nitrogen cycle in water and soil while others appeared to inhibit or stimulate for it. This review reports on the most recent evidence of effects of pharmaceuticals on the nitrogen cycle processes by examination of the potential impact of pharmaceuticals on nitrogen fixation, nitrification, ammonification, denitrification, and anammox. Research studies have identified pharmaceuticals that can either inhibit or stimulate nitrification, ammonification, denitrification, and anammox. Among these, amoxicillin, chlortetracycline, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, enrofloxacin, erythromycin, narasin, norfloxacin, and sulfamethazine had the most significant effects on nitrogen cycle processes. This review also clearly demonstrates that some nitrogen transformation processes such as nitrification show much higher sensitivity to the presence of pharmaceuticals than other nitrogen transformations or flows such as mineralization or ammonia volatilization. We conclude by suggesting that future studies take a more comprehensive approach to report on pharmaceuticals' impact on the nitrogen cycle process.

Keywords: Agriculture; Antibiotics; Nitrogen transformation; Pharmaceuticals; Pollution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Nitrogen cycle process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The negative impact of pharmaceuticals on the nitrogen cycle process in water and soil

References

    1. Abu Shmeis, R. M. (2018). Water chemistry and microbiology. In Comprehensive analytical chemistry (1st ed., Vol. 81). Elsevier B.V. 10.1016/bs.coac.2018.02.001
    1. Ahmad, M., Vithanage, M., Kim, K., Cho, J. S., Lee, Y. H., Joo, Y. K., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2014). Inhibitory effect of veterinary antibiotics on denitrification in groundwater: A microcosm approach. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. 10.1155/2014/879831 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akimenko YV, Kazeev KS, Kolesnikov SI. Impact assessment of soil contamination with antibiotics (for example, an ordinary chernozem) American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2015;12(2):80–88. doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2015.80.88. - DOI
    1. Alighardashi A, Pandolfi D, Potier O, Pons MN. Acute sensitivity of activated sludge bacteria to erythromycin. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009;172(2–3):685–692. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.051. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arrigo KR. Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature. 2005;437(7057):349–355. doi: 10.1038/nature04159. - DOI - PubMed