Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 7;2(1):e000004.
doi: 10.1136/bmjos-2018-000004. eCollection 2018.

Protocol for a systematic review of guidelines for rigour in the design, conduct and analysis of biomedical experiments involving laboratory animals

Collaborators, Affiliations

Protocol for a systematic review of guidelines for rigour in the design, conduct and analysis of biomedical experiments involving laboratory animals

Jan Vollert et al. BMJ Open Sci. .

Abstract

Objective: Within the last years, there has been growing awareness of the negative repercussions of unstandardized planning, conduct and reporting of preclinical and biomedical research. Several initiatives have set the aim of increasing validity and reliability in reporting of studies and publications, and publishers have formed similar groups. Additionally, several groups of experts across the biomedical spectrum have published experience and opinion-based guidelines and guidance on potential standardized reporting. While all these guidelines cover reporting of experiments, an important step prior to this should be rigours planning and conduction of studies. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and harmonize existing experimental design, conduct and analysis guidelines relating to internal validity and reproducibility of preclinical animal research. The review will also identify literature describing risks of bias pertaining to the design, conduct and analysis of preclinical biomedical research.

Search strategy: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science will be searched systematically to identify guidelines published in English language in peer-reviewed journals before January 2018 (box 1). All articles or systematic reviews in English language that describe or review guidelines on the internal validity and reproducibility of animal studies will be included. Google search for guidelines published on the websites of major funders and professional organisations can be found in (Box 2).

Screening and annotation: Unique references will be screened in two phases: screening for eligibility based on title and abstract, followed by screening for definitive inclusion based on full text. Screening will be performed in SyRF (http://syrf.org.uk). Each reference will be randomly presented to two independent reviewers. Disagreements between reviewers will be resolved by additional screening of the reference by a third, senior researcher.

Data management and reporting: All data, including extracted text and guidelines, will be stored in the SyRF platform. Elements of the included guidelines will be identified using a standardized extraction form. Reporting will follow the PRISMA guidelines as far as applicable.

Keywords: BMJOS; drug evaluation, preclinical; protocols & guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2011;10:712. 10.1038/nrd3439-c1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kilkenny C, Parsons N, Kadyszewski E, et al. . Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS One 2009;4:e7824. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007824 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirst JA, Howick J, Aronson JK, et al. . The need for randomization in animal trials: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One 2014;9:e98856. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098856 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. du Sert NP, Bamsey I, Bate ST, et al. . The experimental design assistant. Nat Methods 2017;14:1024–5. 10.1038/nmeth.4462 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RB, et al. . SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:43. 10.1186/1471-2288-14-43 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources