Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 12;62(7):947-955.
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab167.

Digital Ageism: Challenges and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence for Older Adults

Affiliations

Digital Ageism: Challenges and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence for Older Adults

Charlene H Chu et al. Gerontologist. .

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are changing our world through their impact on sectors including health care, education, employment, finance, and law. AI systems are developed using data that reflect the implicit and explicit biases of society, and there are significant concerns about how the predictive models in AI systems amplify inequity, privilege, and power in society. The widespread applications of AI have led to mainstream discourse about how AI systems are perpetuating racism, sexism, and classism; yet, concerns about ageism have been largely absent in the AI bias literature. Given the globally aging population and proliferation of AI, there is a need to critically examine the presence of age-related bias in AI systems. This forum article discusses ageism in AI systems and introduces a conceptual model that outlines intersecting pathways of technology development that can produce and reinforce digital ageism in AI systems. We also describe the broader ethical and legal implications and considerations for future directions in digital ageism research to advance knowledge in the field and deepen our understanding of how ageism in AI is fostered by broader cycles of injustice.

Keywords: Bias; Gerontology; Machine learning; Technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cycles of injustices in how technology is developed, applied, and understood by members of society (Whittlestone et al., 2019).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
How cycles of injustice in digital technologies result in digital ageism.

References

    1. Abbey, R., & Hyde, S. (2009). No country for older people? Age and the digital divide. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 7(4), 225–242. doi:10.1108/14779960911004480 - DOI
    1. Academy of Royal Medical Colleges . (2019). Artificial intelligence in healthcare.https://www.aomrc.org.uk/reports-guidance/artificial-intelligence-in-hea...
    1. Ajunwa, I. (2018). How artificial intelligence can make employment discrimination worse. The Independent. https://suindependent.com/artificial-intelligence-can-make-employment-di...
    1. Ajunwa, I. (2019). Beware of automated hiring. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/08/opinion/ai-hiring-discrimination.html
    1. AlgorithmWatch . (2021). AI ethics guidelines global inventory. https://algorithmwatch.org/en/ai-ethics-guidelines-global-inventory/

Publication types