Effect of Varying Repositioning Frequency on Pressure Injury Prevention in Nursing Home Residents: TEAM-UP Trial Results
- PMID: 35051978
- PMCID: PMC9119401
- DOI: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000817840.68588.04
Effect of Varying Repositioning Frequency on Pressure Injury Prevention in Nursing Home Residents: TEAM-UP Trial Results
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of three nursing-home-wide repositioning intervals (2-, 3-, or 4-hour) without compromising pressure injury (PrI) incidence in 4 weeks.
Methods: An embedded pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in nine nursing homes (NHs) that were randomly assigned to one of three repositioning intervals. Baseline (12 months) and 4-week intervention data were provided during the TEAM-UP (Turn Everyone And Move for Ulcer Prevention) study. Intervention residents were without current PrIs, had PrI risk (Braden Scale score) ≥10 (not severe risk), and used viable 7-inch high-density foam mattresses. Each arm includes three NHs with an assigned single repositioning interval (2-, 3-, or 4-hour) as standard care during the intervention. A wireless patient monitoring system, using wearable single-use patient sensors, cued nursing staff by displaying resident repositioning needs on conveniently placed monitors. The primary outcome was PrI incidence; the secondary outcome was staff repositioning compliance fidelity.
Results: From May 2017 to October 2019, 1,100 residents from nine NHs were fitted with sensors; 108 of these were ineligible for some analyses because of missing baseline data. The effective sample size included 992 residents (mean age, 78 ± 13 years; 63% women). The PrI incidence during the intervention was 0.0% compared with 5.24% at baseline, even though intervention resident clinical risk scores were significantly higher (P < .001). Repositioning compliance for the 4-hour repositioning interval (95%) was significantly better than for the 2-hour (80%) or 3-hour (90%) intervals (P < .001).
Conclusions: Findings suggest that current 2-hour protocols can be relaxed for many NH residents without compromising PrI prevention. A causal link was not established between repositioning interval treatments and PrI outcome; however, no new PrIs developed. Compliance improved as repositioning interval lengthened.
Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Figures
References
-
- National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance . Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guideline. 2nd ed. Haesler E, ed. Perth, Australia: Cambridge Media; 2014.
-
- Chaboyer W Bucknall T Webster J, et al. . The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): a cluster randomised trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2016;64:63–71. - PubMed
-
- Coleman S Gorecki C Nelson EA, et al. . Patient risk factors for pressure ulcer development: systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:974–1003. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services . Nursing Home Compare. https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/search.html. Last accessed January 3, 2022.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
