Distal Gastrectomy for Symptomatic Stage IV Gastric Cancer Contributes to Prognosis with Acceptable Safety Compared to Gastrojejunostomy
- PMID: 35053551
- PMCID: PMC8773932
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020388
Distal Gastrectomy for Symptomatic Stage IV Gastric Cancer Contributes to Prognosis with Acceptable Safety Compared to Gastrojejunostomy
Abstract
Background: The prognostic prolongation effect of reduction surgery for asymptomatic stage IV gastric cancer (GC) is unfavorable; however, its prognostic effect for symptomatic stage IV GC remains unclear. We aimed to compare the prognosis of gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy for symptomatic stage IV GC.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study analyzed record-based data of patients undergoing palliative surgery for symptomatic stage IV GC in the middle or lower-third regions between January 2015 and December 2019. Patients were divided into distal gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy groups. We compared clinicopathological features and outcomes after propensity score matching (PSM).
Results: Among the 126 patients studied, 46 and 80 underwent distal gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy, respectively. There was no difference in postoperative complications between the groups. Regarding prognostic factors, surgical procedures and postoperative chemotherapy were significantly different in multivariate analysis. Each group was further subdivided into groups with and without postoperative chemotherapy. After PSM, the data of 21 well-matched patients with postoperative chemotherapy and 8 without postoperative chemotherapy were evaluated. Overall survival was significantly longer in the distal gastrectomy group (p = 0.007 [group with postoperative chemotherapy], p = 0.02 [group without postoperative chemotherapy]).
Conclusions: Distal gastrectomy for symptomatic stage IV GC contributes to prognosis with acceptable safety compared to gastrojejunostomy.
Keywords: distal gastrectomy; gastric cancer; gastrojejunostomy; palliative surgery; stage IV.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Koizumi W., Narahara H., Hara T., Takagane A., Akiya T., Takagi M., Miyashita K., Nishizaki T., Kobayashi O., Takiyama W., et al. S-1 Plus Cisplatin Versus S-1 Alone for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer (SPIRITS Trial): A phase III Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–221. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70035-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bang Y.J., Van Cutsem E., Feyereislova A., Chung H.C., Shen L., Sawaki A., Lordick F., Ohtsu A., Omuro Y., Satoh T., et al. Trastuzumab in Combination with Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Treatment of HER2-Positive Advanced Gastric or Gastro-oesophageal Junction Cancer (ToGA): A phase 3, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ohtsu A., Shah M.A., Van Cutsem E., Rha S.Y., Sawaki A., Park S.R., Lim H.Y., Yamada Y., Wu J., Langer B., et al. Bevacizumab in Combination with Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled phase III Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:3968–3976. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.2236. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yamada Y., Boku N., Mizusawa J., Iwasa S., Kadowaki S., Nakayama N., Azuma M., Sakamoto T., Shitara K., Tamura T., et al. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin and S-1 Versus Cisplatin and S-1 in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer (JCOG1013): An Open-Label, phase 3, Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;4:501–510. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30083-4. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources