Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 15;12(1):205.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010205.

Assessing SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies after BNT162b2 Vaccination and Their Correlation with SARS-CoV-2 IgG Anti-S1, Anti-RBD and Anti-S2 Serological Titers

Affiliations

Assessing SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies after BNT162b2 Vaccination and Their Correlation with SARS-CoV-2 IgG Anti-S1, Anti-RBD and Anti-S2 Serological Titers

Angélica Ramos et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

The humoral response through neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is a key component of the immune response to COVID-19. However, the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), the gold standard for determining NAbs, is technically demanding, time-consuming and requires BSL-3 conditions. Correlating the NAbs and total antibodies levels, assessed by generalized and automated serological tests, is crucial. Through a commercial surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT), we aimed to evaluate the production of SARS-CoV-2 NAbs in a set of vaccinated healthcare workers and to correlate these NAbs with the SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-S1, anti-RBD and anti-S2 serological titers. We found that 6 months after vaccination, only 74% maintain NAbs for the Wuhan strain/UK variant (V1) and 47% maintain NAbs for the South African and Brazil variants (V2). Through Spearman's correlation, we found the following correlations between the percentage of inhibition of NAbs and the SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA) and BioPlex 2200 SARS-CoV-2 IgG Panel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) immunoassays: rho = 0.87 (V1) and rho = 0.73 (V2) for anti-S1 assessed by Abbott assay; rho = 0.77 (V1) and rho = 0.72 (V2) for anti-S1, rho = 0.88 (V1) and rho = 0.82 (V2) for anti-RBD, and rho = 0.68 (V1) and rho = 0.60 (V2) for anti-S2 assessed by BioPlex assay (p < 0.001 for all). In conclusion, we found a strong correlation between this fast, user-friendly, mobile and bio-safe sVNT and the serological immunoassays.

Keywords: BNT162b2 vaccine; SARS-CoV-2; neutralizing antibodies; serological immunoassays; surrogate virus neutralization test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing inhibition (PI) as a function of SARS-CoV-2 IgG serological titer. The PI of NAbs for V1 (blue) and V2 (orange) are correlated with (A) anti-S1 (Abbott), (B) anti-S1 (BioPlex), (C) anti-RBD and (D) anti-S2 serological titer. The red line represents the sVNT cut-off. PI results < 20% are reported as “negative,” and PI ≥ 20% are reported as “positive”.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing inhibition (PI) as a function of SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-S1 in serum collected 3 months after vaccination from NAbs-negative participants. The PI of NAbs for V1 (blue) and V2 (orange) are correlated with anti-S1 (Abbott) serological titer in 8 NAbs-negative participants at 6 months after vaccination. The red line represents the sVNT cut-off. PI results < 20% are reported as “negative,” and PI ≥ 20% are reported as “positive”.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean percentages of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing inhibition (PI) at 6 and 10 months (n = 21) after the 2nd dose and 1 month (n = 13) after the 3rd dose of Pfizer vaccine for V1 (blue) and V2 (orange). The red line represents the sVNT cut-off. PI results < 20% are reported as “negative,” and PI ≥ 20% are reported as “positive”.

References

    1. Baden L.R., El Sahly H.M., Essink B., Kotloff K., Frey S., Novak R., Diemert D., Spector S.A., Rouphael N., Creech C.B., et al. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:403–416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polack F.P., Thomas S.J., Kitchin N., Absalon J., Gurtman A., Lockhart S., Perez J.L., Pérez Marc G., Moreira E.D., Zerbini C., et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:2603–2615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall V.J., Foulkes S., Saei A., Andrews N., Oguti B., Charlett A., Wellington E., Stowe J., Gillson N., Atti A., et al. COVID-19 vaccine coverage in health-care workers in England and effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against infection (SIREN): A prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet. 2021;397:1725–1735. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00790-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benenson S., Oster Y., Cohen M.J., Nir-Paz R. BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness among Health Care Workers. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:1775–1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2101951. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jalkanen P., Kolehmainen P., Häkkinen H.K., Huttunen M., Tähtinen P.A., Lundberg R., Maljanen S., Reinholm A., Tauriainen S., Pakkanen S.H., et al. COVID-19 mRNA vaccine induced antibody responses against three SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:3991. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24285-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources