Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 26;12(1):31.
doi: 10.3390/life12010031.

Comparison of Dosimetry Protocols for Electron Beam Radiotherapy Calibrations and Measurement Uncertainties

Fawzia E M Elbashir  1 , Wassim Ksouri  2 , Mohamed Hassan Eisa  3 , Sitah Alanazi  3 , Farouk Habbani  4 , Abdelmoneim Sulieman  5 , David A Bradley  6   7 , Ibrahim I Suliman  3   8
Affiliations

Comparison of Dosimetry Protocols for Electron Beam Radiotherapy Calibrations and Measurement Uncertainties

Fawzia E M Elbashir et al. Life (Basel). .

Abstract

This paper presents guidelines for the calibration of radiation beams that were issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA TRS 398), the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM TG 51) and the German task group (DIN 6800-2). These protocols are based on the use of an ionization chamber calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in a standard laboratory's reference quality beam, where the previous protocols were based on air kerma standards. This study aims to determine uncertainties in dosimetry for electron beam radiotherapy using internationally established high-energy radiotherapy beam calibration standards. Methods: Dw was determined in 6-, 12- and 18 MeV electron energies under reference conditions using three cylindrical and two plane-parallel ion chambers in concert with the IAEA TRS 398, AAPM TG 51 and DIN 6800-2 absorbed dose protocols. From mean measured Dw values, the ratio TRS 398/TG 51 was found to vary between 0.988 and 1.004, while for the counterpart TRS 398/DIN 6800-2 and TG 51/DIN 6800-2, the variation ranges were 0.991-1.003 and 0.997-1.005, respectively. For the cylindrical chambers, the relative combined uncertainty (k = 1) in absorbed dose measurements was 1.44%, while for the plane-parallel chambers, it ranged from 1.53 to 1.88%. Conclusions: A high degree of consistency was demonstrated among the three protocols. It is suggested that in the use of the presently determined dose conversion factors across the three protocols, dose intercomparisons can be facilitated between radiotherapy centres.

Keywords: absorbed dose standards; ionisation chamber; medical LINAC; radiation dosimetry; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ratio of the absorbed dose to water values obtained using five ionization chambers in three electron beams: (a) IAEA TRS 398/AAPM TG 51; (b) IAEA TRS 398/DIN 6800-2; (c) AAPM TG 51/DIN 6800-2.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Ratio of the absorbed dose to water values obtained using five ionization chambers in three electron beams: (a) IAEA TRS 398/AAPM TG 51; (b) IAEA TRS 398/DIN 6800-2; (c) AAPM TG 51/DIN 6800-2.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Andreo P., Burns D.T., Hohlfeld K., Huq M.S., Kanai T., Laitano F., Smyth V., Vynckier S. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water. IAEA TRS 398; International Atomic Energy Agency; Vienna, Austria: 2004.
    1. Almond P.R., Biggs P.J., Coursey B.M., Hanson W.F., Huq M.S., Nath R., Rogers D.W. AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med. Phys. 1999;26:1847–1870. doi: 10.1118/1.598691. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deutsches Institut für Normung . Dosismessverfahren Nach der Sondenmethode für Photonen-und Elektronenstrahlung Teil 2: Ionisationsdosimetrie DIN 6800-2. Deutsches Institut für Normung; Berlin, Germany: 2008.
    1. Lillicrap S.C., Owen B., Williams J.R., Williams P.C. Code of practice for high-energy photon therapy dosimetry based on the NPL absorbed dose calibration service. Phys. Med. Biol. 1990;35:1355–1360. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/35/10/301. - DOI
    1. IAEA . Absorbed Dose Determination in Photon and Electron Beams. International Atomic Energy Agency; Vienna, Austria: 1997. (International Code of Practice, IAEA Tech. Series No.277).

LinkOut - more resources