Prognostic Genomic Tissue-Based Biomarkers in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
- PMID: 35055380
- PMCID: PMC8781984
- DOI: 10.3390/jpm12010065
Prognostic Genomic Tissue-Based Biomarkers in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
Abstract
In localized prostate cancer clinicopathologic variables have been used to develop prognostic nomograms quantifying the probability of locally advanced disease, of pelvic lymph node and distant metastasis at diagnosis or the probability of recurrence after radical treatment of the primary tumor. These tools although essential in daily clinical practice for the management of such a heterogeneous disease, which can be cured with a wide spectrum of treatment strategies (i.e., active surveillance, RP and radiation therapy), do not allow the precise distinction of an indolent instead of an aggressive disease. In recent years, several prognostic biomarkers have been tested, combined with the currently available clinicopathologic prognostic tools, in order to improve the decision-making process. In the following article, we reviewed the literature of the last 10 years and gave an overview report on commercially available tissue-based biomarkers and more specifically on mRNA-based gene expression classifiers. To date, these genomic tests have been widely investigated, demonstrating rigorous quality criteria including reproducibility, linearity, analytical accuracy, precision, and a positive impact in the clinical decision-making process. Albeit data published in literature, the systematic use of these tests in prostate cancer is currently not recommended due to insufficient evidence.
Keywords: localized prostate cancer; prognostic factors; tissue-based biomarkers.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Mottet N., van den Bergh R.C.N., Briers E., Van den Broeck T., Cumberbatch M.G., De Santis M., Fanti S., Fossati N., Gandaglia G., Gillessen S., et al. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur. Urol. 2021;79:243–262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tosoian J.J., Chappidi M., Feng Z., Humphreys E.B., Han M., Pavlovich C.P., Epstein J.I., Partin A.W., Trock B.J. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era. BJU Int. 2017;119:676–683. doi: 10.1111/bju.13573. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Briganti A., Larcher A., Abdollah F., Capitanio U., Gallina A., Suardi N., Bianchi M., Sun M., Freschi M., Salonia A., et al. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: The essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur. Urol. 2012;61:480–487. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044. - DOI - PubMed
-
- University of California San Francisco Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment and the UCSF-CAPRA Score. [(accessed on 10 September 2021)]. Available online: https://urology.ucsf.edu/research/cancer/prostate-cancer-risk-assessment....
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources