Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 24;58(1):26.
doi: 10.3390/medicina58010026.

Sepsis in Burns-Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock

Affiliations
Review

Sepsis in Burns-Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock

Dorothee Boehm et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

After surviving the acute phase of resuscitation, septic shock is the cause of death in the majority of burn patients. Therefore, the management of septic shock is a cornerstone in modern burn care. Whereas sepsis therapy in general has undergone remarkable developments in the past decade, the management of septic shock in burn patients still has a long way to go. Instead, the differences of burn patients with septic shock versus general patients have been emphasized and thus, burn patients were excluded in every sepsis study which are the basis for modern sepsis therapy. However, due to the lack of evidence in burn patients, the standards of procedure for general sepsis therapy have been adopted in burn care. This review identifies the differences of burn patients with sepsis versus other septic patients and summarizes the scientific basis for modern sepsis therapy in general ICU patients and burn patients. Consequently, the results in general sepsis research should be transferred to burn care, which means the implementation of effective screening, early resuscitation, and efficient antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, on the basis of past developments and in the light of the current update of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, this review introduces the "Burn SOFA score" and the "3 H's of burn sepsis" as a screening tool for early sepsis recognition in burn patients.

Keywords: SOFA; antibiotic timing; burns; sepsis; septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Boehm D., Menke H. History of fluid management—From “One size fits all” to an individualized fluid therapy in burn resuscitation. Medicina. 2021;57:187. doi: 10.3390/medicina57020187. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams F.N., Herndon D.N., Hawkins H.K., Lee J.O., Cox R.A., Kulp G.A., Finnerty C.C., Chinkes D.L., Jeschke M.G. The leading causes of death after burn injury in a single paediatric burn centre. Crit. Care. 2009;13:R183. doi: 10.1186/cc8170. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma B.R., Harish D., Singh V.P., Bangar S. Septicaemia as a cause of death in burns: An autopsy study. Burns. 2006;32:545–549. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2006.02.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeschke M.G., Pinto R., Kraft R., Nathens A.B., Finnerty C.C., Gamelli R.L., Gibran N.S., Klein M.B., Arnoldo B.D., Tompkins R.D., et al. Morbidity and survival probability in burn patients in modern burn care. Crit. Care Med. 2015;43:808–815. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000790. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fitzwater J., Purdue G.F., Hunt J.L., O’Keefe G.E. The risk factors and time courses sepsis and organ dysfunction after burn trauma. J. Trauma. 2003;54:959–966. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000029382.26295.AB. - DOI - PubMed

Substances