Antihypertensive drug effects on long-term blood pressure: an individual-level data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
- PMID: 35058294
- PMCID: PMC9340038
- DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320171
Antihypertensive drug effects on long-term blood pressure: an individual-level data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
Abstract
Objective: Evidence from randomised trials of pharmacological treatments on long-term blood pressure (BP) reduction is limited. We investigated the antihypertensive drug effects on BP over time and across different participant characteristics.
Methods: We conducted an individual patient-level data meta-analysis of 52 large-scale randomised clinical trials in the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration using mixed models to examine treatment effects on BP over 4 years of mean follow-up.
Results: There were 363 684 participants (42% women), with baseline mean age=65 years and mean systolic/diastolic BP=152/87 mm Hg, and among whom 19% were current smokers, 49% had cardiovascular disease, 28% had diabetes and 69% were taking antihypertensive treatment at baseline. Drugs were effective in lowering BP showing maximal effect after 12 months and gradually attenuating towards later years. Based on measures taken ≥12 months postrandomisation, mean systolic/diastolic BP difference (95% CI) between more and less intense BP-lowering treatment was -11.1 (-11.3 to -10.8)/-5.6 (-5.7 to -5.4) mm Hg; between active treatment and placebo was -5.1 (-5.3 to -5.0)/-2.3 (-2.4 to -2.2) mm Hg; and between active and control arms for drug comparison trials was -1.4 (-1.5 to -1.3)/-0.6 (-0.7 to -0.6) mm Hg. BP reductions were observed across different baseline BP values and ages, and by sex, history of cardiovascular disease and diabetes and prior antihypertensive treatment use.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that BP-lowering pharmacotherapy is effective in lowering BP, up to 4 years on average, in people with different characteristics. Appropriate treatment strategies are needed to sustain substantive long-term BP reductions.
Keywords: clinical; hypertension; meta-analysis; pharmacology.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: DC reports grants from the British Heart Foundation, during the conduct of the study. MN and AP reports grants from the British Heart Foundation outside the submitted work. JS reports ownership in companies providing services to Itrim, Amgen, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Boehringer, Bayer, Pfizer and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. MW reports personal fees from Amgen, Kyowa Kirin and Freeline outside the submitted work. KR reports grants from the British Heart Foundation, UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund, Oxford Martin School, and National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from BMJ Heart and PLOS Medicine, outside the submitted work. EC, RR, AS, JD, FF and BRD declare no competing interests.
Figures



References
-
- Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. . 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association Task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:e127–248. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Joint Committee for Guideline Revision . 2018 Chinese guidelines for prevention and treatment of Hypertension-A report of the revision Committee of Chinese guidelines for prevention and treatment of hypertension. J Geriatr Cardiol 2019;16:182–241. 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.03.014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources