Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 21;10(1):e33518.
doi: 10.2196/33518.

Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review

Van C Willis et al. JMIR Med Inform. .

Abstract

Background: Disease prevention is a central aspect of primary care practice and is comprised of primary (eg, vaccinations), secondary (eg, screenings), tertiary (eg, chronic condition monitoring), and quaternary (eg, prevention of overmedicalization) levels. Despite rapid digital transformation of primary care practices, digital health interventions (DHIs) in preventive care have yet to be systematically evaluated.

Objective: This review aimed to identify and describe the scope and use of current DHIs for preventive care in primary care settings.

Methods: A scoping review to identify literature published from 2014 to 2020 was conducted across multiple databases using keywords and Medical Subject Headings terms covering primary care professionals, prevention and care management, and digital health. A subgroup analysis identified relevant studies conducted in US primary care settings, excluding DHIs that use the electronic health record (EHR) as a retrospective data capture tool. Technology descriptions, outcomes (eg, health care performance and implementation science), and study quality as per Oxford levels of evidence were abstracted.

Results: The search yielded 5274 citations, of which 1060 full-text articles were identified. Following a subgroup analysis, 241 articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies primarily examined DHIs among health information technologies, including EHRs (166/241, 68.9%), clinical decision support (88/241, 36.5%), telehealth (88/241, 36.5%), and multiple technologies (154/241, 63.9%). DHIs were predominantly used for tertiary prevention (131/241, 54.4%). Of the core primary care functions, comprehensiveness was addressed most frequently (213/241, 88.4%). DHI users were providers (205/241, 85.1%), patients (111/241, 46.1%), or multiple types (89/241, 36.9%). Reported outcomes were primarily clinical (179/241, 70.1%), and statistically significant improvements were common (192/241, 79.7%). Results were summarized across the following 5 topics for the most novel/distinct DHIs: population-centered, patient-centered, care access expansion, panel-centered (dashboarding), and application-driven DHIs. The quality of the included studies was moderate to low.

Conclusions: Preventive DHIs in primary care settings demonstrated meaningful improvements in both clinical and nonclinical outcomes, and across user types; however, adoption and implementation in the US were limited primarily to EHR platforms, and users were mainly clinicians receiving alerts regarding care management for their patients. Evaluations of negative results, effects on health disparities, and many other gaps remain to be explored.

Keywords: clinical decision support systems; digital technology; preventive medicine; primary health care; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: VCW was employed by IBM Corporation. KJTC is employed by IBM Corporation. YJ has no conflicts. ELS was employed by IBM Corporation. YEA was employed by IBM Corporation. MA has no conflicts. KBR was employed by IBM Corporation. AB has no conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow diagram illustrates the flow of information through the different phases of the scoping review, including the number of records identified, included and excluded records, and the reasons for exclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of the study design and key findings. Scoping review study design and summarization of results across the categories of study population, intervention, and outcomes. N/A, not applicable.

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Future of Primary Care . In: Primary Care: America's Health in a New Era. Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, Vanselow NA, editors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1996. - PubMed
    1. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, USA; 1998.
    1. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/16202000 MILQ409 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hensrud DD. Clinical preventive medicine in primary care: background and practice: 1. Rationale and current preventive practices. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Feb;75(2):165–72. doi: 10.4065/75.2.165.S0025-6196(11)64189-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rubin HR. Overcoming barriers to preventive care. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jun;15(6):434–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.115600.x. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pu... jgi115600 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types