Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;33(2):425-433.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03203-4. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

Modified use of the proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate for distal femoral nonunions

Affiliations

Modified use of the proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate for distal femoral nonunions

Josje Poelmann et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Nonunion is a common complication after a distal femoral fracture (DFF). Standard treatment consists of revision plating and/or bone grafting. Single lateral plating for a distal femoral nonunion can be insufficient in case of a persistent medial gap and compromised bone stock. Alternatively, dual plating can be used to treat a distal femoral nonunion, but to date there is no Gold standard. The aim of our study was to report our results after use of a minimally invasively placed proximal humeral internal locking system (Philos) plate as a medial buttress in the treatment of a distal femoral nonunion.

Methods: Fifteen adult patients with a distal femoral nonunion were prospectively entered in a trauma database and retrospectively assessed. All patients underwent a similar operation, which included removal of failed hardware, nonunion debridement, fixation with a lateral plate, and a medial Philos plate combined with bone grafting. Data collected included union rate, time to union, complications and functional outcome.

Results: In twelve out of fifteen patients (80%), the fracture united after our index operation. Median time to union was 4.8 months (range 1.6-15). Three patients (20%) needed additional bone grafting surgery. One patient underwent a Judet quadricepsplasty.

Conclusion: This study suggests that the Philos plate is a safe and effective adjunct as a medial buttress plate for distal femoral nonunions.

Keywords: Distal femoral fracture; Dual Plating; Nonunion; Philos.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

In the conflict of interest disclosure form we certify that there is no potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Application of the Philos plate on the distal femur. Medial incision on the distal femur (a). The Philos plate which is inserted along the medial border using a small single incision (b) Percutaneous minimal invasive attachment of the plate to the femur (c, d)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A seventy-six year old female was referred to us after several attempts to heal a comminuted extra-articular distal femur fracture (33A3) (a). Initial fracture treatment in another institution consisted of a LISS plate (b). Revision surgery with a new LISS plate and cerclage around hip prosthesis was performed 8 months after initial fracture treatment (c). Three days later a second revision surgery with a LISS plate was performed due to malposition of the previous plate (d). Six months later the patient underwent additional bone grafting surgery and was then referred to us with a persistent nonunion. At 20 months after the initial fracture we performed our index nonunion surgery with a 95-degree condylar blade plate and a Philos plate medially. In addition, autologous bone grafting was performed (e). Another bone grafting surgery with addition of three cancellous screws was performed six months later. Union was confirmed 2 months later (f). Radiographic imaging 19 months after index nonunion surgery show bone union and a well preserved knee joint (g)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–697. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elsoe R, Ceccotti AA, Larsen P. Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. Int Orthop. 2018;42(1):191–196. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3665-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoon BH, Park IK, Kim Y, Oh HK, Choo SK, Sung YB. Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(2):225–233. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03463-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ebraheim NA, Buchanan GS, Liu X, Cooper ME, Peters N, Hessey JA, Liu J. Treatment of distal femur nonunion following initial fixation with a lateral locking plate. Orthop Surg. 2016;8(3):323–330. doi: 10.1111/os.12257. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. von Keudell A, Shoji K, Nasr M, Lucas R, Dolan R, Weaver MJ. Treatment options for distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(Suppl 2):S25–S27. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000621. - DOI - PubMed