2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization: what is the correct level of evidence for the superiority of cephalic vein cutdown? C, B or maybe A?
- PMID: 35061865
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac001
2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization: what is the correct level of evidence for the superiority of cephalic vein cutdown? C, B or maybe A?
Comment in
-
2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization: what is the correct level of evidence for the superiority of cephalic vein cutdown? C, B or maybe A?-Author's reply.Europace. 2022 Apr 5;24(4):697. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac002. Europace. 2022. PMID: 35061881 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization: what is the correct level of evidence for the superiority of cephalic vein cutdown? C, B or maybe A?-Author's reply.Europace. 2022 Apr 5;24(4):697. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac002. Europace. 2022. PMID: 35061881 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
