2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization: what is the correct level of evidence for the superiority of cephalic vein cutdown? C, B or maybe A?-Author's reply
- PMID: 35061881
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac002
2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization: what is the correct level of evidence for the superiority of cephalic vein cutdown? C, B or maybe A?-Author's reply
Comment in
-
2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization: what is the correct level of evidence for the superiority of cephalic vein cutdown? C, B or maybe A?Europace. 2022 Apr 5;24(4):697. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac001. Europace. 2022. PMID: 35061865 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364. Eur Heart J. 2021. PMID: 34455430 No abstract available.
-
2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization: what is the correct level of evidence for the superiority of cephalic vein cutdown? C, B or maybe A?Europace. 2022 Apr 5;24(4):697. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac001. Europace. 2022. PMID: 35061865 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
