Thermal Cycling Effect on Locator System Retention and Metal Surface Roughness
- PMID: 35061925
- PMCID: PMC10078641
- DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13481
Thermal Cycling Effect on Locator System Retention and Metal Surface Roughness
Abstract
Purpose: To estimate the effects of the thermal cycling (TC) process on the metal surfaces of Locators, as well as retention loss, and the correlation between them.
Materials and methods: Twenty-five new Locator R-Tx were included in the study. Four areas were marked on each Locators' patrix metal surface and scanned using a confocal scanner (μsurf explorer; NanoFocus). Three surface roughness parameters were measured in the scans: Sa (average distance of peaks from the central plain of the area), Vmp (volume of the peaks in the area), and Spc (mean curvature of the peaks describing the degree of their sharpness). Retention test was performed using Instron® 4500 compression tension tensile tester at a speed of 10 mm/min. The retention tests were done using a working model made of two acrylic blocks in which the Locator system parts were inserted. The surface parameters measurements and the retention tests were performed 2 times, once before and once after TC. The Locators were subjected to 15,000 TC cycles by investing them into 2 tubs with different water temperatures, 55°C and 5°C. During each 60-second cycle, the Locators were submerged in each tub for 20 seconds, with a 10 second transition time between the tubs. The post-TC retention and surface parameters measurements were compared with those prior to TC and the prior to TC measurements served as controls. Changes in parameters before and after TC were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA nested model with random intercept and slope by restricted maximum likelihood method. Correlation between retention and surface parameters was quantified and examined using Kendall's correlation test. The findings were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.
Results: There was a significant decrease in retention of 16.6N at the second retention test (p < 0.001). A significant statistical decrease in surface parameters were measured after TC process, Sa and Vmp (18 ×10-3 μm, p = 0.041 and 0.94 ×10-3 1/μm, p = 0.001, respectively). A significant statistical increase in Spc of 6.4 ×10-3 μm3 /μm2 (p = 0.023) was noticed. The correlation between retention decreases and surface changes was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: The TC process causes a substantial reduction in retention to the Locator system over time. In addition, TC causes significant but minor changes to the Locator surface area. Most of the changes are in the horizontal dimension.
Keywords: Locator; Thermal aging; metal surface; roughness parameters; thermal cycling.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Prosthodontics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Prosthodontists.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest in regards to the current study.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink Locator attachments: an in vitro study.J Prosthodont. 2010 Apr;19(3):226-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00550.x. Epub 2009 Dec 21. J Prosthodont. 2010. PMID: 20040032
-
Brushing effect on the retentive force of retentive inserts in three denture attachments: An in vitro study.J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Sep;128(3):487.e1-487.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Aug 5. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. PMID: 35934574
-
The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink locator attachments after multiple pulls: an in vitro study.J Prosthodont. 2011 Aug;20(6):464-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00722.x. Epub 2011 Jul 20. J Prosthodont. 2011. PMID: 21777332
-
Variables related to materials and preparing for bond strength testing irrespective of the test protocol.Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.154. Epub 2010 Jan 13. Dent Mater. 2010. PMID: 20074788 Review.
-
Fabrication of a Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture with a New Attachment System: A Review of Current Attachment Systems.Int J Prosthodont. 2017 May/June;30(3):245–247. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5068. Epub 2017 Mar 20. Int J Prosthodont. 2017. PMID: 28319214 Review.
References
-
- Hutton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY, et al: Factors related to success and failure rates at 3‐year follow‐up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1995;10:33‐42 - PubMed
-
- van Kampen FMC, van der Bilt A, Cune MS, et al: Masticatory function with implant‐supported overdentures. J Dent Res 2004;83:708‐711 - PubMed
-
- The glossary of prosthodontic terms: ninth edition. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:e1‐e105 - PubMed
-
- Visser A, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA, et al: Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5‐year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:19‐25 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources