Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;31(9):771-777.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.13481. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

Thermal Cycling Effect on Locator System Retention and Metal Surface Roughness

Affiliations

Thermal Cycling Effect on Locator System Retention and Metal Surface Roughness

Vladimir Perlis et al. J Prosthodont. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the effects of the thermal cycling (TC) process on the metal surfaces of Locators, as well as retention loss, and the correlation between them.

Materials and methods: Twenty-five new Locator R-Tx were included in the study. Four areas were marked on each Locators' patrix metal surface and scanned using a confocal scanner (μsurf explorer; NanoFocus). Three surface roughness parameters were measured in the scans: Sa (average distance of peaks from the central plain of the area), Vmp (volume of the peaks in the area), and Spc (mean curvature of the peaks describing the degree of their sharpness). Retention test was performed using Instron® 4500 compression tension tensile tester at a speed of 10 mm/min. The retention tests were done using a working model made of two acrylic blocks in which the Locator system parts were inserted. The surface parameters measurements and the retention tests were performed 2 times, once before and once after TC. The Locators were subjected to 15,000 TC cycles by investing them into 2 tubs with different water temperatures, 55°C and 5°C. During each 60-second cycle, the Locators were submerged in each tub for 20 seconds, with a 10 second transition time between the tubs. The post-TC retention and surface parameters measurements were compared with those prior to TC and the prior to TC measurements served as controls. Changes in parameters before and after TC were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA nested model with random intercept and slope by restricted maximum likelihood method. Correlation between retention and surface parameters was quantified and examined using Kendall's correlation test. The findings were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.

Results: There was a significant decrease in retention of 16.6N at the second retention test (p < 0.001). A significant statistical decrease in surface parameters were measured after TC process, Sa and Vmp (18 ×10-3 μm, p = 0.041 and 0.94 ×10-3 1/μm, p = 0.001, respectively). A significant statistical increase in Spc of 6.4 ×10-3 μm3 /μm2 (p = 0.023) was noticed. The correlation between retention decreases and surface changes was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The TC process causes a substantial reduction in retention to the Locator system over time. In addition, TC causes significant but minor changes to the Locator surface area. Most of the changes are in the horizontal dimension.

Keywords: Locator; Thermal aging; metal surface; roughness parameters; thermal cycling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest in regards to the current study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Locator marked with a “+”. The upper larger ring is “L” and the smaller ring above it is “s”.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Original scan; (b) Flattening and extracting the area for analysis; (c) 3D illustration of surface roughness; (d) A scale describing the difference in height in color.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hutton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY, et al: Factors related to success and failure rates at 3‐year follow‐up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1995;10:33‐42 - PubMed
    1. van Kampen FMC, van der Bilt A, Cune MS, et al: Masticatory function with implant‐supported overdentures. J Dent Res 2004;83:708‐711 - PubMed
    1. The glossary of prosthodontic terms: ninth edition. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:e1‐e105 - PubMed
    1. Visser A, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA, et al: Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5‐year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:19‐25 - PubMed
    1. Sischo L, Broder HL: Oral health‐related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res 2011;90:1264‐1270 - PMC - PubMed