Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr;18(4):205-218.
doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00627-6. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

The role of sugar-sweetened beverages in the global epidemics of obesity and chronic diseases

Affiliations
Review

The role of sugar-sweetened beverages in the global epidemics of obesity and chronic diseases

Vasanti S Malik et al. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a major source of added sugars in the diet. A robust body of evidence has linked habitual intake of SSBs with weight gain and a higher risk (compared with infrequent SSB consumption) of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases and some cancers, which makes these beverages a clear target for policy and regulatory actions. This Review provides an update on the evidence linking SSBs to obesity, cardiometabolic outcomes and related cancers, as well as methods to grade the strength of nutritional research. We discuss potential biological mechanisms by which constituent sugars can contribute to these outcomes. We also consider global trends in intake, alternative beverages (including artificially-sweetened beverages) and policy strategies targeting SSBs that have been implemented in different settings. Strong evidence from cohort studies on clinical outcomes and clinical trials assessing cardiometabolic risk factors supports an aetiological role of SSBs in relation to weight gain and cardiometabolic diseases. Many populations show high levels of SSB consumption and in low-income and middle-income countries, increased consumption patterns are associated with urbanization and economic growth. As such, more intensified policy efforts are needed to reduce intake of SSBs and the global burden of obesity and chronic diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

V.S.M. is on a pro bono retainer for expert support for litigation related to sugar-sweetened beverages and has served as a consultant for the City of San Francisco for a case related to health warning labels on soda. There are no other financial or personal conflicts of interest to disclose that are related to the content of this paper. F.B.H. declares no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Global trends in sugar-sweetened beverage intake by sex.
Mean intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) (grams of SSB per day) from 1990 to 2015 in seven world super-regions, that is, grouping of world regions that exhibit similar cause-of-death patterns. These are: Asia, comprising east and Southeast Asia, former Soviet Union countries (FSU), western high-income countries (HIC), Latin America and Caribbean countries (LAC), Middle East and north Africa (MENA), south Asia (SAARC), and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Data are shown separately for men (part a) and women (part b). For reference, 237 g of SSB is equivalent to 8 fl oz (237 ml) of SSB and 355 g of SSB is equivalent to 12 fl oz (355 ml) of SSB. Data are obtained from: Global Dietary Database.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Global intake of sugar-sweetened beverages in 1990 and 2015.
Mean intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) (grams of SSB per day) in 1990 (part a) and 2015 (part b). The colour of individual countries corresponds to SSB consumption level, with lower intakes shown in green (0–200 g per day) and higher intakes shown in red (500–600 g per day). Countries with no data are shown in white. Data are for men and women combined. For reference, 237 grams of SSB is equivalent to 8 fl oz (237 ml) of SSB and 355 grams of SSB is equivalent to 12 fl oz (355 ml) of SSB. Data are obtained from: Global Dietary Database.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Biological mechanisms for sugar-sweetened beverage intake and development of obesity, cardiometabolic risk and related chronic diseases.
Biological mechanisms linking intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) to the development of obesity, intermediate cardiometabolic risk factors (such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, hypertension, insulin resistance, inflammation and dyslipidaemia) and related chronic diseases (the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular disease and cancer). Mechanisms that promote weight gain and obesity include: an incomplete compensatory reduction in food intake in response to liquid calories provided by SSBs; hyperinsulinaemia induced by rapid absorption of glucose; and potential activation of the dopaminergic reward system in the brain. Obesity increases cardiometabolic risk and is associated with the development of related chronic diseases. Elevated risk of these outcomes also occurs independently of weight gain through the development of risk factors precipitated by adverse glycaemic effects and fructose metabolism in the liver. Excess fructose ingestion promotes uric acid production, hepatic de novo lipogenesis, accumulation of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and ectopic lipid deposition, and can lead to the development of gout and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. HFCS, high-fructose corn syrup. Adapted from ref., CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390:2627–2642. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:13–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dobbs R. et al. Overcoming obesity: an initial economic analysis. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.sportanddev.org/en/article/publication/overcoming-obesity-in... (2014).
    1. Hruby A, et al. Determinants and consequences of obesity. Am. J. Public Health. 2016;106:1656–1662. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303326. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malik VS, Willett WC, Hu FB. Global obesity: trends, risk factors and policy implications. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013;9:13–27. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.199. - DOI - PubMed