Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;27(1):016501.
doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.27.1.016501.

Effects of shell-integrated Sudan Black dye on the acoustic activity and ultrasound imaging properties of lipid-shelled nanoscale ultrasound contrast agents

Affiliations

Effects of shell-integrated Sudan Black dye on the acoustic activity and ultrasound imaging properties of lipid-shelled nanoscale ultrasound contrast agents

Dana Wegierak et al. J Biomed Opt. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Significance: An effective contrast agent for concurrent multimodal photoacoustic (PA) and ultrasound (US) imaging must have both high optical absorption and high echogenicity. Integrating a highly absorbing dye into the lipid shell of gas core nanobubbles (NBs) adds PA contrast to existing US contrast agents but may impact agent ultrasonic response.

Aim: We report on the development and ultrasonic characterization of lipid-shell stabilized C3F8 NBs with integrated Sudan Black (SB) B dye in the shell as dual-modal PA-US contrast agents.

Approach: Perfluoropropane NBs stabilized with a lipid shell including increasing concentrations of SB B dye were formulated by amalgamation (SBNBs). Physical properties of SBNBs were characterized using resonant mass measurement, transmission electron microscopy and pendant drop tensiometry. Concentrated bubble solutions were imaged for 8 min to assess signal decay. Diluted bubble solutions were stimulated by a focused transducer to determine the response of individual NBs to long cycle (30 cycle) US. For assessment of simultaneous multimodal contrast, bulk populations of SBNBs were imaged using a PA and US imaging platform.

Results: We produced high agent yield (∼1011) with a mean diameter of ∼200 to 300 nm depending on SB loading. A 40% decrease in bubble yield was measured for solutions with 0.3 and 0.4 mg / ml SB. The addition of SB to the shell did not substantially affect NB size despite an increase in surface tension by up to 8 mN / m. The bubble decay rate increased after prolonged exposure (8 min) by dyed bubbles in comparison to their undyed counterparts (2.5-fold). SB in bubble shells increased gas exchange across the shell for long cycle US. PA imaging of these agents showed an increase in power (up to 10 dB) with increasing dye.

Conclusions: We added PA contrast function to NBs. The addition of SB increased gas exchange across the NB shell. This has important implications in their use as multimodal agents.

Keywords: contrast agents; multimodal imaging; nanobubbles; photoacoustic imaging; rectified diffusion; ultrasound imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(a) Two-dimensional chemical structure of SB B and (b) optical absorption spectrum of SB B dye in different solvents (reproduced with permission).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sample size distribution of NBs and nonbuoyant particles prepared from lipid solution without SB before pore filtration as measured using the Archimedes RMM system.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(a) Inverse bubble stability setup featuring a linear transducer (Toshiba, Tochigi-Ken, Japan, 6-MHz transmit, 12-MHz receive, 240 kPa peak negative pressure, M.I, 0.1), and 1% agarose mold with three narrow channels (3×5×6  mm) separated 4 mm apart; (b) US images from the inverted setup; Image of 1 in 100 diluted 0.5  mg/ml SB B NBs in PBS; top of image corresponds to the top of the transducer, bottom of image corresponds to air-exposed top of channel; sample ROI indicated by yellow box; figure created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Submerged multimodal US/PA experimental setup; a 10% polyacrylamide phantom with 6 hollow channels (1-mm diam; 1-mm separation) housed in a clear holder to block vessel ends; Vevo LAZR 2100 system with 256-element linear array LZ250 transducer (21 MHz central frequency; 13 to 24 MHz bandwidth) and common US/PA focus at 11-mm imaging depth. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Representative transmission electron microscopy images for lipid-shelled NBs with differing SB B content (a) 0 mg; (b) 0.3; and (c) 0.5  mg/ml in the lipid shell solution.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
(a) SBNB concentration and (b) diameter from RMM (n=3) differences between the average bubble diameter for varying bubble formulations were also determined to be not significant.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Raw data for pendant drop tensiometry. Profiles of pendant drops of (a) PGG solution and PGG solution with (b) 0.1; (c) 0.2; (d) 0.3; (e) 0.4; (f) 0.5  mg/ml added SB B, respectively, for lipid-shell stabilized NBs; (scale bar=0.5251  mm).
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Surface tension as measured from bulk droplets of lipid solution containing varying contributions of SB B dissolved in the lipid. (n=20; bars represent standard deviation).
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
(a) US power decay normalized to maximum power of time series (Toshiba, Tochigi-Ken, Japan, 6-MHz transmit, 12 MHz receive, 240 kPa peak negative pressure, M.I, 0.1) for 1 in 100 dilution NBs in PBS with differing concentrations of SB B in the lipid shell. (b) Bubble decay rates after 8 min continuous US stimulation for lipid-stabilized with varying concentrations of SB B dye in the lipid shell.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
(a)–(c) Single bubble signal count as a function of acoustic pressure. (n=3) and SB contribution in lipid-shell. (d)–(f) Average contribution of signal types to total signal count summed over all pressures (n=3); average total number of signals = 511 (0  mg/ml), 261 (0.2  mg/ml), and 246 (0.4  mg/ml).
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Representative PA(top)/US (bottom) images with channels containing 1:29 dilution of 0 mg, 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg, 0.3 mg, 0.4 mg, 0.5 mg Sudan Black from left to right; average PA (center; n=9) and US (right; n=9) signal from SBNBs.

References

    1. Beard P., “Biomedical photoacoustic imaging,” Interface Focus 1(4), 602–631 (2011).10.1098/rsfs.2011.0028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson K. E., Wang T. Y., Willmann J. K., “Acoustic and photoacoustic molecular imaging of cancer,” J. Nucl. Med. 54(11), 1851–1854 (2013).JNMEAQ10.2967/jnumed.112.115568 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim C., et al. , “Multifunctional microbubbles and nanobubbles for photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging,” J. Biomed. Opt. 15(1), 010510 (2010).JBOPFO10.1117/1.3302808 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frinking P., et al. , “Three decades of ultrasound contrast agents: a review of the past, present and future improvements,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. 46(4), 892–908 (2020).USMBA310.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.12.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Szabo T. L., Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, California: (2004).

Publication types