Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2525-2532.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.180. Epub 2021 Dec 29.

Developing a How-to-Guide for Health Technology Reassessment: "The HTR Playbook"

Affiliations

Developing a How-to-Guide for Health Technology Reassessment: "The HTR Playbook"

Lesley J J Soril et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Background: To develop a knowledge translation (KT) tool that will provide guidance to stakeholders actively planning or considering implementation of a health technology reassessment (HTR) initiative.

Methods: The KT tool is an international and collaborative endeavour between HTR researchers in Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Evidence from a meta-review of documented international HTR experiences and approaches provided the conceptual framing for the KT tool. The purpose, audience, format, and overall scope and content of the tool were established through iterative discussions and consensus. An initial version of the KT tool was beta-tested with an international community of relevant stakeholders (i.e., potential users) at the Health Technology Assessment International 2018 annual meeting.

Results: An open access workbook, referred to as the HTR playbook, was developed. As a KT tool, the HTR playbook is intended to simplify the complex HTR planning process by navigating users step-by-step through 6 strategic domains: characteristics of the candidate health technology (The Stats and Projections), stakeholders to engage (The Team), potential facilitators and/or barriers within the policy context (The Playing Field), strategic use of different levers and tools (The Offensive Plays), unintended consequences (The Defensive Plays), and metrics and methods for monitoring and evaluation (Winning the Game).

Conclusion: The HTR playbook is intended to enhance a user's ability to successfully complete a HTR by helping them systematically consider the different elements and approaches to achieve the right care for the patient population in question.

Keywords: De-Implementation; Disinvestment; Health Services Misuse; Health Technology Reassessment; Low Value Care; Medical Overuse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2

References

    1. Sevick K, Soril LJJ, MacKean G, Noseworthy TW, Clement FM. Unpacking early experiences with health technology reassessment in a complex healthcare system. Int J HealthcManag 2020;13:2:156-162. 10.1080/20479700.2017.1337679. - DOI
    1. Pant S, Boucher M, Frey N. Health Technology Reassessment: An Overview of Canadian and International Processes. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs & Technologies in Health (CADTH); 2019.
    1. Scott IA, Duckett SJ. In search of professional consensus in defining and reducing low-value care. Med J Aust. 2015;203(4):179–181. doi: 10.5694/mja14.01664. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elshaug AG, Rosenthal MB, Lavis JN, et al. Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care. Lancet. 2017;390(10090):191–202. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32586-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colla CH, Mainor AJ, Hargreaves C, Sequist T, Morden N. Interventions aimed at reducing use of low-value health services: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev. 2017;74(5):507–550. doi: 10.1177/1077558716656970. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources