Hybrid PET/MRI in Staging Endometrial Cancer: Diagnostic and Predictive Value in a Prospective Cohort

Abstract

Aim: The assessment of deep myometrial invasion (MI) and lymph node involvement is of utmost importance in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer (EC). Imaging parameters derived respectively from MRI and PET have shown good predictive value. The main aim of the present study is to assess the diagnostic performance of hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in EC staging, with particular focus on MI and lymphnodal involvement detection.

Patients and methods: Prospective monocentric study including 35 patients with biopsy-proven EC undergoing preoperative 18F-FDG PET/MRI (December 2018-March 2021) for staging purpose. Histological examination was the reference standard. PET (SUVmax, SUVmean with a threshold of 40% of SUVmax-SUVmean40, metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis) and MRI (volume index [VI], total tumor volume, tumor volume ratio [TVR], mean apparent diffusion coefficient, minimum apparent diffusion coefficient) parameters were calculated on the primary tumor, and their role in predicting EC risk group, the presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and MI was assessed. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the predictive value of PET and MRI parameters on EC characteristics.

Results: Patients' median age was 66.57 years (SD, 10.21 years). 18F-FDG PET/MRI identified the primary tumor in all patients. Twenty-two of 35 patients had high-risk EC and 13/35 low-risk disease; 13/35 presented LVSI, 22/35 had deep MI at histological examination, and 13/35 had p53 hyperexpression.PET/MRI was able to detect lymphnodal involvement with high accuracy and high specificity (sensitivity of 0.8571, specificity of 0.9286, accuracy of 0.9143), also showing a high negative predictive value (NPV) for lymphnodal involvement (NPV of 0.9630, positive predictive value [PPV] of 0.7500).The assessment of deep MI using PET/MRI correctly staged 27 patients (77.1%; sensitivity of 0.7273, specificity of 0.8462, accuracy of 0.7714), with also a good PPV (PPV of 0.8889, NPV of 0.647).MRI-derived total tumor volume, VI, and TVR were significant in predicting EC groups (high-risk vs low-risk patients) (P = 0.0059, 0.0235, 0.0181, respectively). MRI-derived volume, VI, TVR, and PET-derived metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis were able to predict LVSI (P = 0.0023, 0.0068, 0.0068, 0.0027, 0.01394, respectively). Imaging was not able to predict grading, presence of deep MI, nor hyperexpression of p53.

Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET/MRI has good accuracy in preoperative staging of EC; PET and MRI parameters have synergic role in preoperatively predicting LVSI, with MRI parameters being also predictive for EC risk group.