Electrical Impedance as a Noninvasive Metric of Quality in Allografts Undergoing Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion
- PMID: 35067581
- PMCID: PMC9247000
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001591
Electrical Impedance as a Noninvasive Metric of Quality in Allografts Undergoing Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion
Abstract
Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) increases the pool of suitable organs for transplant by facilitating assessment and repair at normothermia, thereby improving identification of quality of marginal organs. However, there exists no current objective approach for assessing total organ edema. We sought to evaluate the use of electrical impedance as a metric to assess total organ edema in lungs undergoing EVLP. Adult porcine lungs (40 kg) underwent normothermic EVLP for 4 hours. To induce varying degrees of lung injury, the allografts were perfused with either Steen, a modified cell culture media, or 0.9% normal saline. Physiologic parameters (peak airway pressure and compliance), pulmonary artery and left atrial blood gases, and extravascular lung water measurements were evaluated over time. Wet-to-dry ratios were evaluated postperfusion. Modified Murray scoring was used to calculate lung injury. Impedance values were associated with lung injury scores ( p = 0.007). Peak airway pressure ( p = 0.01) and PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratios ( p = 0.005) were both significantly associated with reduced impedance. Compliance was not associated with impedance ( p = 0.07). Wet/dry ratios were significantly associated with impedance and Murray Scoring within perfusion groups of Steen, Saline, and Modified Cell Culture ( p = 0.0186, 0.0142, 0.0002, respectively). Electrical impedance offers a noninvasive modality for measuring lung quality as assessed by tissue edema in a porcine model of normothermic EVLP. Further studies evaluating the use of impedance to assess organ edema as a quality marker in human clinical models and abdominal organs undergoing ex vivo perfusion warrant investigation.
Copyright © ASAIO 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Figures





References
-
- Tian D, Wang Y, Shiiya H, et al.: Outcomes of marginal donors for lung transplantation after ex vivo lung perfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 159: 720–730.e6, 2020. - PubMed
-
- Snell GI, Paraskeva M, Westall GP: Donor selection and management. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 34: 361–370, 2013. - PubMed
-
- Boffini M, Ricci D, Barbero C, et al.: Ex vivo lung perfusion increases the pool of lung grafts: analysis of its potential and real impact on a lung transplant program. Transplant Proc 45: 2624–2626, 2013. - PubMed
-
- Munshi L, Keshavjee S, Cypel M: Donor management and lung preservation for lung transplantation. Lancet Respir Med 1: 318–328, 2013. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources