Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 1;41(6):628-635.
doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000853. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

Expression of Potential Biomarker Targets by Immunohistochemistry in Cervical Carcinomas

Expression of Potential Biomarker Targets by Immunohistochemistry in Cervical Carcinomas

Lulu Sun et al. Int J Gynecol Pathol. .

Abstract

There have been few clinically useful targetable biomarkers in uterine cervical carcinomas. Estrogen receptor (ER), HER2, and fibroblast activation protein (FAP) are potential therapeutic or theranostic targets in other gynecologic and genitourinary carcinoma types. We determined the immunohistochemical expression patterns of these markers in treatment-naive cervical carcinoma, and whether expression correlated with clinical outcomes after definitive chemoradiation therapy. Tissue microarrays were created from 71 patient samples taken before therapy (57 squamous cell carcinomas and 14 nonsquamous cell carcinomas) and stained for ER, HER2, and FAP. ER was positive in 25/70 cases (36%). Of 66 tumors with evaluable HER2 staining, only 1 had positive (3+) staining (3%, positive for HER2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization), and 1 had equivocal (2+) staining (negative for amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization). The remainder were negative for HER2 overexpression. FAP expression was widely variably in the tumor stroma. ER positivity and FAP expression did not correlate with cervical recurrence, pelvic recurrence, distant recurrence, or cancer death. In conclusion, HER2 amplification is very rare in nonmetastatic treatment-naive cervical carcinomas, but if present, could represent a target for antibody therapy. ER and FAP were expressed in a subset of tumors, but expression did not correlate with clinical outcomes. These immunohistochemical markers do not demonstrate prognostic significance in treatment-naive cervical cancer, but they may have utility in targeted therapy or imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Motter A, Frederick P, Gaffney DK, et al. NCCN Guidelines Cervical Cancer Version 1.2021. 2020. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf Accessed June 16, 2021.
    1. Dueñas-González A, Zarbá JJ, Patel F, et al. Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1678–85.
    1. Tangjitgamol S, Tharavichitkul E, Tovanabutra C, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing concurrent chemoradiation versus concurrent chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: ACTLACC trial. J Gynecol Oncol 2019;30:e82.
    1. Vale C, Tierney JF, Stewart LA, et al. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5802–12.
    1. Mileshkin LR, Moore KN, Barnes E, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared to chemoradiation alone: the randomized phase III OUTBACK Trial (ANZGOG 0902, RTOG 1174, NRG 0274). J Clin Oncol 2021;39(suppl):LBA3.