Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 1;18(5):507-511.
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000971. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

Spinal Cord Stimulators: An Analysis of the Adverse Events Reported to the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration

Affiliations

Spinal Cord Stimulators: An Analysis of the Adverse Events Reported to the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration

Caitlin M P Jones et al. J Patient Saf. .

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulators are used to treat intractable pain. Placebo-controlled trials of spinal cord stimulators typically involve short-term treatment and follow-up, so long-term safety and efficacy are unclear.

Aim: The aim of the study was to describe the adverse events relating to spinal cord stimulators reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia between July 2012 and January 2019.

Methods: Adverse events were coded by seriousness, severity, body system affected, type of event, action taken, and attribution of fault. Data on the number of stimulators implanted and removed were sourced from the Admitted Patient Care Minimum Data Set.

Results: Five hundred twenty adverse events were reported for spinal cord stimulators. Most events were rated as severe (79%) or life-threatening (13%). Device malfunction was the most common event (56.5%). The most common action taken in response to an adverse event was surgical intervention with or without antibiotics (80%). The ratio of removals to implants was 4 per every 10 implanted.

Conclusions: Spinal cords stimulators have the potential for serious harm, and each year in Australia, many are removed. In view of the low certainty evidence of their long-term safety and effectiveness, our results raise questions about their role in providing long-term management of intractable pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose no conflict of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Dydyk AM, Tadi P. Spinal Cord Stimulator Implant. [Updated 2020 Oct 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2020. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555994/. - PubMed
    1. Moore DM, McCrory C. Spinal cord stimulation. BJA Educ. 2016;16:258–263.
    1. Atkinson L Sundaraj SR Brooker C, et al. . Recommendations for patient selection in spinal cord stimulation. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18:1295–1302. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21719293. Accessed April 8, 2020. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain of neuropathic or ischaemic origin; 2008. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta159. Accessed April 13, 2020.
    1. Duarte RV Nevitt S McNicol E, et al. . Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo/sham controlled randomised trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain. Pain. 2020;161:24–35. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31453983. Accessed April 8, 2020. - PubMed