Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 14;12(1):e12098.
doi: 10.1002/clt2.12098. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Reducing severe cutaneous adverse and type B adverse drug reactions using pre-stored human leukocyte antigen genotypes

Affiliations

Reducing severe cutaneous adverse and type B adverse drug reactions using pre-stored human leukocyte antigen genotypes

Kye Hwa Lee et al. Clin Transl Allergy. .

Abstract

Background: Several type B adverse drug reactions (ADRs), especially severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), are associated with particular human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes. However, pre-stored HLA information obtained from other clinical workups has not been used to prevent ADRs. We aimed to simulate the preemptive use of pre-stored HLA information in electronic medical records to evaluate whether this information can prevent ADRs.

Methods: We analyzed the incidence and the risk of ADRs for selected HLA alleles (HLA-B*57:01, HLA-B*58:01, HLA-A*31:01, HLA-B*15:02, HLA-B*15:11, HLA-B*13:01, HLA-B*59:01, and HLA-A*32:01) and seven drugs (abacavir, allopurinol, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, dapsone, methazolamide, and vancomycin) using pre-stored HLA information of transplant patients based on the Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base guidelines and experts' consensus.

Results: Among 11,988 HLA-tested transplant patients, 4092 (34.1%) had high-risk HLA alleles, 4583 (38.2%) were prescribed risk drugs, and 580 (4.8%) experienced type B ADRs. Patients with HLA-B*58:01 had a significantly higher incidence of type B ADR and SCARs associated with allopurinol use than that of patients without HLA-B*58:01 (17.2% vs. 11.9%, odds ratio [OR] 1.53 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.09-2.13], p = 0.001, 2.3% versus 0.3%, OR 7.13 [95% CI 2.19-22.69], p < 0.001). Higher risks of type B ADR and SCARs were observed in patients taking carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine if they had one of HLA-A*31:01, HLA-B*15:02, or HLA-B*15:11 alleles. Vancomycin and dapsone use in HLA-A*32:01 and HLA-B*13:01 carriers, respectively, showed trends toward increased risk of type B ADRs.

Conclusion: Utilization of pre-stored HLA data can prevent type B ADRs including SCARs by screening high-risk patients.

Keywords: adverse drug reaction; human leukocyte antigen; hypersensitivity; pharmacogenomics; preemptive genotyping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Inclusion pipeline of the ADR‐related HLA variants and drugs. ADR, adverse drug reactions; HLA, human leukocyte antigen
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Frequency of pharmacogenomics HLA allele, drug, and adverse drug reactions in patients with pre‐stored HLA data. The left side process represents patients with HLA alleles associated with ADRs (seven alleles); the middle process represents patients who were prescribed medications (seven drugs) with known HLA‐associated ADRs; and the right side process represents HLA‐related ADRs from the Drug Safety Center reports and review of the diagnoses. HLA, human leukocyte antigen; PGx, pharmacogenomics; ADRs, adverse drug reactions; SNUH, Seoul National University Hospital; SJS, Steven–Johnson syndrome; DE, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Comparison of the frequency of type B ADR and SCAR incidence for allopurinol, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and vancomycin. ADR, adverse drug reactions; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; SCAR, severe cutaneous adverse reaction

References

    1. Blenkinsopp A, Wilkie P, Wang M, Routledge PA. Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published literature and international experience. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:148‐156. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta‐analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200‐1205. - PubMed
    1. Bielinski SJ, Olson JE, Pathak J, et al. Preemptive genotyping for personalized medicine: design of the right drug, right dose, right time – using genomic data to individualize treatment protocol. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89:25‐33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rasmussen‐Torvik LJ, Stallings SC, Gordon AS, et al. Design and anticipated outcomes of the eMERGE‐PGx project: a multi‐center pilot for pre‐emptive pharmacogenomics in electronic health record systems. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96:482‐489. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dolgin E. Preemptive genotyping trialed to prevent adverse drug reactions. Nat Med. 2011;17:1323. - PubMed