Checkpoint Inhibitors and Other Immune-Based Therapies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- PMID: 35072373
- DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000573
Checkpoint Inhibitors and Other Immune-Based Therapies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been investigated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an intent to harness the immune microenvironment components to generate an immune response against leukemia. Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and anti-programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 antibodies have been evaluated in combination with low-intensity therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy, both in the pretransplant and posttransplant settings. Although the objective response rates with programmed cell death 1- and programmed cell death ligand 1-based therapies have been relatively low, durable stable disease and hematologic improvement were noted in a subset of patients, important endpoints in patients with limited therapeutic options. Novel AML and myelodysplastic syndrome-specific checkpoints such as TIM3 antibodies in combination with azacitidine are showing encouraging efficacy, especially durability of response, in ongoing studies. Anti-CD47/SIRPα therapy in combination with azacitidine has shown encouraging efficacy and safety in frontline AML, especially in TP53-mutated AML, a population of significant unmet need. Other T cell-based immune therapies are under investigation. T-cell and natural killer cell bispecific and trispecific engagers have shown modest activity in patients with relapsed and/or refractory AML albeit with frequent cytokine release syndrome. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy showed immense success in many lymphoid malignancies and is being evaluated in AML. Future trials should be designed to select patients based on markers of response and tailor therapies according to predictive biomarkers.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: N.D. has received research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Gilead, Sevier, Genentech, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbvie, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE therapeutics, Amgen, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, Trillium, and ImmunoGen and has served in a consulting or advisory role for Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Arog, Pfizer, Novartis, Jazz, Celgene, AbbVie, Astellas, Genentech, Immunogen, Servier, Syndax, Trillium, Gilead, Amgen, Shattuck labs, and Agios. A.M.Z. is a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar in Clinical Research. A.M.Z. received research funding (institutional) from Celgene/BMS, Abbvie, Astex, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Trovagene/Cardiff oncology, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, and ADC Therapeutics. A.M.Z. participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Cardiff Oncology, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Epizyme, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Chiesi, ALX Oncology, BioCryst, and Tyme. A.M.Z. served on clinical trial committees for Novartis, Abbvie, Geron and Celgene/BMS. A.M.Z. received travel support for meetings from Pfizer, Novartis, and Cardiff Oncology. For F.H., none were declared.
References
-
- Wiese M, Daver N. Unmet clinical needs and economic burden of disease in the treatment landscape of acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Manag Care. 2018;24(16 suppl):S347–S355.
-
- Chen KTJ, Gilabert-Oriol R, Bally MB, et al. Recent treatment advances and the role of nanotechnology, combination products, and immunotherapy in changing the therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia. Pharm Res. 2019;36:125. doi:10.1007/s11095-019-2654-z. - DOI
-
- Tamamyan G, Kadia T, Ravandi F, et al. Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;110:20–34. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.12.004. - DOI
-
- Knipp S, Hildebrand B, Kündgen A, et al. Intensive chemotherapy is not recommended for patients aged >60 years who have myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia with high-risk karyotypes. Cancer. 2007;110:345–352. doi:10.1002/cncr.22779. - DOI
-
- Döhner H, Weisdorf DJ, Bloomfield CD. Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1136–1152. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1406184. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous