Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 24;12(1):e053735.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053735.

Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review

Affiliations

Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review

Maria Reinius et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Awareness of patients' innovative capabilities is increasing, but there is limited knowledge regarding the extent and nature of patient-driven innovations in the peer-reviewed literature.

Objectives: The objective of the review was to answer the question: what is the nature and extent of patient-driven innovations published in peer-reviewed scientific journals?

Eligibility criteria: We used a broad definition of innovation to allow for a comprehensive review of different types of innovations and a narrow definition of 'patient driven' to focus on the role of patients and/or family caregivers. The search was limited to years 2008-2020.

Sources of evidence: Four electronic databases (Medline (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO (Ovid) and Cinahl (Ebsco)) were searched in December 2020 for publications describing patient-driven innovations and complemented with snowball strategies.

Charting methods: Data from the included articles were extracted and categorised inductively.

Results: A total of 96 articles on 20 patient-driven innovations were included. The number of publications increased over time, with 69% of the articles published between 2016 and 2020. Author affiliations were exclusively in high income countries with 56% of first authors in North America and 36% in European countries. Among the 20 innovations reported, 'Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas System' and the online health network 'PatientsLikeMe', were the subject of half of the articles.

Conclusions: Peer-reviewed publications on patient-driven innovations are increasing and we see an important opportunity for researchers and clinicians to support patient innovators' research while being mindful of taking over the work of the innovators themselves.

Keywords: diabetes & endocrinology; gastroenterology; internal medicine; neurology; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA 2009 flow diagram. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of publications per year.

References

    1. Oliveira P, Zejnilović L, Canhão H. Challenges and Opportunities in Developing and Sharing Solutions by Patients and Caregivers: The Story of a Knowledge Commons for the Patient Innovation Project. In: Frischmann BM, Strandburg KJ, Madison MJ, eds. Cambridge studies on governing knowledge commons. Cambridge: Governing Medical Knowledge CommonsCambridge University Press, 2017: 301–25.
    1. Lindblad S, Ernestam S, Van Citters AD, et al. . Creating a culture of health: evolving healthcare systems and patient engagement. QJM 2017;110:125–9. 10.1093/qjmed/hcw188 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alakeson V. Let patients control the purse strings. BMJ 2008;336:807–9. 10.1136/bmj.39524.400498.AD - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dent M, Pahor M. Patient involvement in Europe--a comparative framework. J Health Organ Manag 2015;29:546–55. 10.1108/JHOM-05-2015-0078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riggare S. E-patients hold key to the future of healthcare. BMJ 2018;360:k846. 10.1136/bmj.k846 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types