Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 15:2022:7035367.
doi: 10.1155/2022/7035367. eCollection 2022.

A U-Net Approach to Apical Lesion Segmentation on Panoramic Radiographs

Affiliations

A U-Net Approach to Apical Lesion Segmentation on Panoramic Radiographs

Ibrahim S Bayrakdar et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

The purpose of the paper was the assessment of the success of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm formed on a deep-convolutional neural network (D-CNN) model for the segmentation of apical lesions on dental panoramic radiographs. A total of 470 anonymized panoramic radiographs were used to progress the D-CNN AI model based on the U-Net algorithm (CranioCatch, Eskisehir, Turkey) for the segmentation of apical lesions. The radiographs were obtained from the Radiology Archive of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology of the Faculty of Dentistry of Eskisehir Osmangazi University. A U-Net implemented with PyTorch model (version 1.4.0) was used for the segmentation of apical lesions. In the test data set, the AI model segmented 63 periapical lesions on 47 panoramic radiographs. The sensitivity, precision, and F1-score for segmentation of periapical lesions at 70% IoU values were 0.92, 0.84, and 0.88, respectively. AI systems have the potential to overcome clinical problems. AI may facilitate the assessment of periapical pathology based on panoramic radiographs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Annotation of the apical lesion using polygonal box method.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The U-Net architecture for the semantic segmentation task.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Model pipeline for apical lesion segmentation (CranioCatch, Eskisehir, Turkey).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Automatically apical lesion segmentation using AI model (CranioCatch, Eskisehir, Turkey).
Figure 5
Figure 5
An example real-prediction image comparison.

References

    1. Segura-Egea J., Martín-González J., Castellanos-Cosano L. Endodontic medicine: connections between apical periodontitis and systemic diseases. International Endodontic Journal . 2015;48(10):933–951. doi: 10.1111/iej.12507. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Velvart P., Hecker H., Tillinger G. Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology . 2001;92(6):682–688. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.118904. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ridao-Sacie C., Segura-Egea J., Fernández-Palacín A., Bullón-Fernández P., Ríos-Santos J. Radiological assessment of periapical status using the periapical index: comparison of periapical radiography and digital panoramic radiography. International Endodontic Journal . 2007;40(6):433–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01233.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel S., Durack C. Essential Endodontology: Prevention and Treatment of Apical Periodontitis . Third Edition. Blackwell; 2019. Radiology of apical periodontitis. Essential endodontology: prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis; pp. 179–210.
    1. Connert T., Truckenmüller M., ElAyouti A., et al. Changes in periapical status, quality of root fillings and estimated endodontic treatment need in a similar urban German population 20 years later. Clinical Oral Investigations . 2019;23(3):1373–1382. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2566-z. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources