Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;32(3):529-537.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10022-1. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

Building a Common Language to Facilitate Discussion Among Stakeholders in Work Disability: A Consensus Group Approach

Marie-France Coutu  1   2   3 , Marie-José Durand  4   5   6 , Daniel Coté  7 , Dominique Tremblay  5   8 , Chantal Sylvain  4   5   6 , Marie-Michelle Gouin  9 , Karine Bilodeau  10 , Iuliana Nastasia  7 , Marie-Andrée Paquette  4   5 , Marie-Elise Labrecque  4   5
Affiliations

Building a Common Language to Facilitate Discussion Among Stakeholders in Work Disability: A Consensus Group Approach

Marie-France Coutu et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Work disability stakeholders may not share the same understanding and solutions among themselves or with researchers, causing misunderstandings and hindering collaboration regarding solutions for preventing work disability. To reduce such differences, this study sought to build a common vocabulary among stakeholders and researchers, using a transdisciplinary research framework.

Methods: A consensus method based on a constructivist approach was used. A theoretical sampling method was applied to identify researchers or stakeholders representing one of the four systems in the work disability paradigm. A preliminary set of definitions for key terms was assessed using a Web-based questionnaire. It documented participants' level of agreement with each term's inclusion and relevance in the field, and the clarity of the definition, while soliciting suggestions for other terms or clearer definitions. Disagreements were discussed at group meetings, yielding consensus on the final terms and definitions.

Results: Eleven stakeholders representing patients, employers, unions, healthcare professionals, and legislative and insurance systems, along with 10 multidisciplinary researchers, participated. The questionnaire yielded initial consensus on the inclusion and definitions of 49 terms, and 109 suggestions mostly for modified definitions (average = 6 suggestions/term). Two preliminary terms were excluded and three terms were added. Ultimately, 80 terms and their definitions yielded consensus.

Conclusions: The process we used to build a common vocabulary was carried out within a transdisciplinary framework. It required a constructivist approach, promoting idea exchanges among participants and co-construction of generally agreed results. The results were rooted in local contexts, thus ensuring the same reference points, regardless of participants' different understandings.

Keywords: Communication; Disability; Intersectoral collaboration; Transdisciplinary research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Vezina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, et al. Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manag Health Out. 2001;9(7):351–360. - DOI
    1. Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–524. - DOI
    1. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Baril R, Gervais J, Langley A. Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):581–590. - DOI
    1. Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–352. - DOI
    1. Tjulin Å, MacEachen E. The importance of workplace social relations in the return to work process: a missing piece in the return to work puzzle? In: Schultz IGR, editor. Handbook of return to work handbooks in health, work, and disability. Boston: Springer; 2016. p. 81–87. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources