Implant-Based Reconstruction following Mastectomy in Patients Who Have Had a Previous Breast Augmentation: Lessons from the National Multicenter Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation Study
- PMID: 35077406
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008713
Implant-Based Reconstruction following Mastectomy in Patients Who Have Had a Previous Breast Augmentation: Lessons from the National Multicenter Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation Study
Abstract
Background: Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed cosmetic procedure, and increasingly women in this group present with breast cancer or request risk-reducing surgery, but their optimal management is unclear. The authors explored the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following previous augmentation and compared these with outcomes of patients who had not had cosmetic implants in the Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation (iBRA) Study.
Methods: Patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction were prospectively recruited from breast and plastic surgical units across the United Kingdom. Demographic, operative, and oncologic data, and information regarding complications within 3 postoperative months were collected. Patient-reported outcomes at 18 months were assessed using the BREAST-Q. The clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without previous breast augmentation were compared.
Results: A total of 2108 women were included in the iBRA Study, of whom 49 had undergone a previous augmentation. Women in the augmentation group were younger (median age, 45 years versus 50 years; p = 0.01), had a lower body mass index (22.8 kg/m2 versus 24.9 kg/m2; p < 0.01), and had smaller tumors (15 mm versus 25 mm; p = 0.01) than patients without augmentation. No differences were seen in operative technique between the groups. Complications at 3 months were similar in both groups and there were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes at 18 months.
Conclusions: The clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following previous augmentation are consistent with those observed in the wider iBRA Study cohort, supporting the safety of this approach.
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this article. There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2020 plastic surgery statistics. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics . Accessed September 18, 2020.
-
- British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons. Cosmetic surgery stats. Available at: https://baaps.org.uk/baaps_annual_audit_results_.aspx . Accessed May 1, 2020.
-
- Handel N, Lewinsky B, Silverstein MJ, Gordon P, Zierk K. Conservation therapy for breast cancer following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:873–878.
-
- Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P, Waisman E, Gierson ED. Mammographic measurements before and after augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:1126–1130.
-
- Lesniak DM, Millochau J, Wang KC, et al. Breast-conserving therapy can be offered to women with prior breast augmentation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:1456–1462.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
