Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):e053419.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053419.

Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives and trainees

Affiliations

Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives and trainees

Carla Perrotta et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To explore obstetricians', midwives' and trainees' perceptions of caesarean section (CS) determinants in the context of public obstetric care services provision in Argentina. Our hypothesis is that known determinants of CS use may differ in settings with limited access to essential obstetric services.

Setting: We conducted a formative research study in 19 public maternity hospitals in Argentina. An institutional survey assessed the availability of essential obstetric services. Subsequently, we conducted online surveys and semistructured interviews to assess the opinions of providers on known CS determinants.

Results: Obstetric services showed an adequate provision of emergency obstetric care but limited services to support women during birth. Midwives, with some exceptions, are not involved during labour. We received 680 surveys from obstetricians, residents and midwives (response rate of 63%) and interviewed 26 key informants. Six out of 10 providers (411, 61%) indicated that the use of CS is associated with the complexities of our caseload. Limited pain management access was deemed a potential contributing factor for CS in adolescents and first-time mothers. Providers have conflicting views on the adequacy of training to deal with complex or prolonged labour. Obstetricians with more than 10 years of clinical experience indicated that fear of litigation was also associated with CS. Overall, there is consensus on the need to implement interventions to reduce unnecessary CS.

Conclusions: Public maternity hospitals in Argentina have made significant improvements in the provision of emergency services. The environment of service provision does not seem to facilitate the physiological process of vaginal birth. Providers acknowledged some of these challenges.

Keywords: maternal medicine; organisation of health services; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the hospital selection for the on-line survey component and semistructured interviews. OB/GYN, obstetrics and gynaecology.

References

    1. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, et al. . Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health 2021;6:e005671. 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ministerio de Salud de la Nación Argentina . Dirección de Estadísticas e Información de la Salud [Internet].. Available: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/salud/deis [Accessed 20 Nov 2021].
    1. Rudey EL, Leal MdoC, Rego G. Cesarean section rates in Brazil: trend analysis using the Robson classification system. Medicine 2020;99:e19880. 10.1097/MD.0000000000019880 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. . What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health 2015;12:57. 10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, et al. . Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG 2016;123:745–53. 10.1111/1471-0528.13592 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types