Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):1350.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05251-6.

Assessment of fluid unresponsiveness guided by lung ultrasound in abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Assessment of fluid unresponsiveness guided by lung ultrasound in abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study

Stéphane Bar et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

A fluid challenge can generate an infraclinical interstitial syndrome that may be detected by the appearance of B-lines by lung ultrasound. Our objective was to evaluate the appearance of B-lines as a diagnostic marker of preload unresponsiveness and postoperative complications in the operating theater. We conducted a prospective, bicentric, observational study. Adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery were included. Stroke volume (SV) was determined before and after a fluid challenge with 250 mL crystalloids (Delta-SV) using esophageal Doppler monitoring. Responders were defined by an increase of Delta-SV > 10% after fluid challenge. B-lines were collected at four bilateral predefined zones (right and left anterior and lateral). Delta-B-line was defined as the number of newly appearing B-lines after a fluid challenge. Postoperative pulmonary complications were prospectively recorded according to European guidelines. In total, 197 patients were analyzed. After a first fluid challenge, 67% of patients were responders and 33% were non-responders. Delta-B-line was significantly higher in non-responders than responders [4 (2-7) vs 1 (0-3), p < 0.0001]. Delta-B-line was able to diagnose fluid non-responders with an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.80, p < 0.0001). The best threshold was two B-lines with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 57%. The final Delta-B-line could predict postoperative pulmonary complications with an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.80, p = 0.0004). Delta-B-line of two or more detected in four lung ultrasound zones can be considered to be a marker of preload unresponsiveness after a fluid challenge in abdominal surgery.The objectives and procedures of the study were registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03502460; Principal investigator: Stéphane BAR, date of registration: April 18, 2018).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Pleural line (vertical arrows indicate the bat sign, with ribs and pleural line). One A-line at the standardized location (horizontal arrows). (B) B-lines. 6 B-lines visible between two ribs in short-axis. (C) BLUE-points. The BLUE-protocol uses three points per lung. Two hands are applied this way, against the clavicule. Two points are anterior, the upper-BLUE-point (middle of upper hand, that is, roughly, second intercostal space between parasternal and anterior axillary line) and the lower-BLUE-point (middle of lower palm). One point, continuing transversally the lower BLUE-point as «posterior as possible, is the posterolateral alveolar pleural syndrome-point» (PLAPS-point). Note that the PLAPS-point seems rather cranial, but is in actual fact just a bit above the diaphragm usually. (D) The lateral point. For adapting the approach to the perioperative setting with its constraints in this study, we took a clinically accessible lateral point located transversally between lower BLUE-point and PLAPS-point, and longitudinally between anterior and posterior axillary line. Note that, if a theoretical point is not accessible for any reason, device or other, the BLUE-points are flexible up to a large tolerance (indicated by the areas in the cartouche).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study protocol.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow chart of the study.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Analysis of the Delta-SV value according to the Delta-B-line. n = the number of datapoints for each value of the Delta-B-line. *p < 0.05 for the comparison to the Delta-SV for 0 Delta-B-line. Figure generated from MedCalc Statistical Software version 19.7 (MedCalc Software Ltd, Ostend, Belgium; https://www.medcalc.org; 2021).

References

    1. Bellamy MC. Wet, dry or something else? Br. J. Anaesth. 2006;97:755–757. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael290. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller TE, et al. Association between perioperative fluid management and patient outcomes: A multicentre retrospective study. Br. J. Anaesth. 2021;126:720–729. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vallet B, et al. Guidelines for perioperative haemodynamic optimization. Ann. Fr. Anesth. Réanimation. 2013;32:e151–e158. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.09.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knuuti J, et al. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: Cardiovascular assessment and management. Eur. Heart J. 2014;35:2383–2431. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht512. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferré A, et al. Lung ultrasound allows the diagnosis of weaning-induced pulmonary oedema. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:601–608. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05573-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data