Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 1;37(2):180-190.
doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000949.

Supporting the Ross procedure: preserving root physiology while mitigating autograft dilatation

Affiliations
Review

Supporting the Ross procedure: preserving root physiology while mitigating autograft dilatation

Dustin Tanaka et al. Curr Opin Cardiol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this article is to describe the optimized approach to nonrepairable aortic valve disease in young adults with a Ross procedure, while preserving the dynamic physiology of the aortic root.

Recent findings: As the techniques for supporting pulmonary autografts continue to be refined, and the applicability of the Ross procedure continues to expand, an assessment of the various techniques based on aortic root physiology is warranted. Semi-resorbable scaffolds show promise in ovine models for improving the Ross procedure. Recent long-term outcomes for the Dacron inclusion technique in comparison to more physiologic methods of support emphasize the importance of balancing the prevention of early dilatation with the preservation of root haemodynamics. As this review will synthesize, the dynamic physiology of the root may be preserved even in patients at a higher risk of autograft dilatation.

Summary: The favourable long-term outcomes of the Ross procedure can be partly attributed to the ability of the autograft to restore dynamism to the neoaortic root. Patient-specific modifications that respect root physiology can tailor the Ross procedure to address each patient's risk factors for early dilatation and late failure. As such, the Ross procedure should be recognized as an increasingly favourable solution for a wide spectrum of nonpreservable aortic valve disease in young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Antoniou A, Harky A, Bashir M, El Khoury G. Why I choose to repair and not to replace the aortic valve? Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67:20–24.
    1. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017; 38:2739–2791.
    1. David TE. Aortic valve repair and aortic valve-sparing operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149:9–11.
    1. Schneider U, Hofmann C, Schöpe J, et al. Long-term results of differentiated anatomic reconstruction of bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 5:1366–1373.
    1. Elbatarny M, Tam DY, Edelman JJ, et al. Valve-sparing root replacement versus composite valve grafting in aortic root dilation: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 110:296–306.

LinkOut - more resources