Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 26;22(1):65.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03075-y.

Retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in Dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting

Affiliations

Retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in Dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting

Stijn C M Donker et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Introduction: Knowledge, once acquired, degrades over time. Exams that contain questions related to previously acquired knowledge ('retrieval practice questions') may promote retrieval practice and spaced learning, and subsequently prevent knowledge loss. To investigate this hypothesis, we compare the score of retrieval practice questions to regular questions in exams of a two-year (bio)medical study program.

Methods: The two-year "Mechanisms of Health and Disease"-program for biomedical sciences and medical students in Nijmegen (the Netherlands) contains 14 spaced exams of 80 questions each. The percentages of correct-, false-, and non-answers were compared between regular questions and retrieval practice questions. Using Pearson correlations between question scores and exam scores (RiT-values), the impact of retrieval practice questions on the internal consistency of exams was determined. Mixed model analyses determined changes in outcomes across time.

Results: Analysis of 2006 regular questions and 1728 retrieval practice questions revealed a significantly higher percentage of correct and false answers, and a significantly lower percentage of non-answers, in retrieval practice questions versus regular questions (all P < 0.05). Scores did not change across time. RiT-values were slightly lower in retrieval practice questions, with a small inverse trend across time.

Conclusion: Our data indicate preservation of knowledge, possibly related to retrieval practice and/or spaced learning. Although the RiT-values of retrieval practice questions were slightly lower than those of regular questions, the discriminative capacity was well within acceptable range. These data highlight the potency of retrieval practice questions to prevent knowledge decrement, without altering exam quality.

Keywords: Knowledge retention; Medical education; Progress testing; Retrieval practice; Spaced learning; The forgetting curve.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
%Cor (graph A), %False (Graph B), %Open (graph C) and RiT (graph D) are plotted against N of repetitions. Questions are grouped (separate lines) based on their origin within the ‘mechanism of health and disease’-program related to the six distinct periods in which new knowledge is introduced to students. The first data point of a line (repetition zero) represents the RQs, whilst consecutive data points of the same line (repetition 1–10) represent the RPQs. Mixed model analyses were used to analyse trends of changes in %Cor, %False, %Open and RiT in relation to the number of repetitions. Error bars represent standard error of the mean and are plotted on one side of the data points for aesthetical reasons

References

    1. Dempster FN. Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice. Educ Psychol Rev. 1989;1(4):309–330. doi: 10.1007/BF01320097. - DOI
    1. Cepeda NJ, Vul E, Rohrer D, Wixted JT, Pashler H. Spacing effects in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention: research article. Psychol Sci. 2008;19(11):1095–1102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murre JMJ, Dros J. Replication and analysis of Ebbinghaus’ forgetting curve. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):1–23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120644. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Little JL, Bjork EL, Bjork RA, Angello G. Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting. Psychol Sci. 2012;23(11):1337–1344. doi: 10.1177/0956797612443370. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carpenter SK, Kelly JW. Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012;19(3):443–448. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0221-2. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources